Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;14:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-140

Table 3.

Between-gender differences combining HIGH and LOW group participants for self-reported measures, including baseline adjustment

Baseline (n = 160) Week 4 (n = 158) Week 4-baseline (n = 158) Week 16 (n = 150) Week 16-baseline (n = 150)
Self-rated mobility as good* 1.2 (0.5 to 3.4), 0.690 1.0 (0.5 to 2.4), 0.940 1.0 (0.4 to 2.3), 0.999 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1), 0.082†∫ 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1), 0.078†∫
Self-rated strength as good* 0.8 (0.2 to 2.4), 0.632 0.4 (0.1 to 1.3), 0.136 0.4 (0.1 to 1.4), 0.155 0.6 (0.3 to 1.5), 0.310†∫ 0.7 (0.3 to 1.7), 0.387†∫
Self-rated balance as good* 0.9 (0.4 to 2.0), 0.718 1.0 (0.4 to 2.4), 0.940 1.0 (0.4 to 2.6), 0.953 0.8 (0.3 to 1.9), 0.611†∫ 0.9 (0.4 to 2.0), 0.711†∫
Self-rated pain as none or slight* 0.8 (0.3 to 1.9), 0.602 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6), 0.450 0.8 (0.3 to 1.7), 0.505 1.0 (0.4 to 2.5), 0.920 1.1 (0.5 to 2.6), 0.887
Self-rated health as worse* 1.0 (0.4 to 2.1), 0.899 0.9 (0.4 to 2.0), 0.772§ 0.9 (0.4 to 2.0), 0.785§ 0.7 (0.3 to 1.9), 0.476 0.8 (0.3 to 2.1), 0.605
Modified falls efficacy scale 10.3 (-2.3 to 22.8), 0.109†‡ 8.4 (-3.8 to 20.7), 0.174†§ 3.7 (-7.3 to 14.6), 0.507†ǁ 4.7 (-9.8 to 19.3), 0.520†∫ -0.7 (-13.8 to 12.4), 0.916**
EQ5D 0.02 (-0.09 to 0.1), 0.765 0.04 (-0.07 to 0.2), 0.510 0.03 (-0.07 to 0.1), 0.535 -0.03 (-0.2 to 0.09), 0.610†∫ -0.04 (-0.2 to 0.08), 0.529†∫

Results as mean (95% CI), p unless *indicating results as odds ratio (CI 95%), p; indicates men performed better than women; n = 158; §n = 157; ǁn = 155; n = 149; **n = 146.