Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: Dalton Trans. 2007 Apr 16;(21):2150–2162. doi: 10.1039/b702938a

Table 1.

Comparison of internal N–Cu–N angles for cross-bridged (CB) cyclam and cyclen copper(u) complexes

Ligand trans-N–Cu–N angle/° cis-N–Cu–N angle/° cis-N–Cu–O angle/°
CB-cyclam 179.7(3) 88.5(3)
Bn2–CB-cyclam 177.8(2) 88.4(2)
1 176.5(2) 84.5(2) 80.28(9), 84.69(8)
177.5(1) 84.8(2) 81.31(9), 85.63(9)
H1 172.92(8) 86.36(8) 84.03(7), 76.06(7)
2
5-coordinate 178.6(2) 86.0(2) 93.0(2)
6-coordinate 173.3(2) 82.4(2) 93.0(2), 89.6(1)
H2 179.7(1) 84.7(1) 92.30(7), 87.56(6)
H22 179.3(1) 85.3(1) 93.22(8), 87.13(9)
CB-cyclen 160.4(1) 85.4(1)
165.3(5) 84.7(4)
Bn2–CB-cyclen 167.9(3) 81.0(3)
3 159.0(3) 86.4(3) 82.6(3), 79.5(3)