Table 1.
Intervention/country | Aim | Intervention method/design & duration | Target group &Sample size | Outcomes/results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Economic empowerment of women | ||||
1) Shaping the Health of Adolescents in Zimbabwe (SHAZ!) Program[20] | Increased knowledge, Increased economic empowerment, Reduced inter-generational TS | Pilot study | - 50 poor orphaned, out-of-school, girls aged 16-19 years | - Increase in HIV-related knowledge and relationship |
- Uncontrolled study for 6 months | - Power, no significant change in current sexual activity or condom use at last sex | |||
- Microcredit loans | - Living on the | - Increased relationship power[21] | ||
- Business skills training | outskirts of Harare, Zimbabwe | - Increased HIV risk through new mobility and economic strategies | ||
- Mentorship | - 315 aadolescent girls, orphans, average age 18 | - Increase in HIV-related knowledge and relationship power, no significant change in current sexual activity or condom use at last sex | ||
Phase II study: | ||||
Randomized clinical trial (RCT) | ||||
Study | - Decrease in food insecurity | |||
Duration 24 months, Adaptation of Stepping Stones, including expanded training including negotiation skills, Integrated social support | - Increase in equitable gender norms | |||
- Physical and sexual violence reduce by 58% over a 2-year period | ||||
Access to HIV and reproductive health services | ||||
2) Intervention with Microfinance for AIDS & Gender Equity (IMAGE)[22, 23], South Africa | Reduced HIV risk behaviour | Cluster randomised trial, duration of 3 year | - A sample of 430 poor women aged 14-35 years identified through participatory wealth ranking | - 55% increase in experience of IPV after 1 year |
- Increase in HIV knowledge, communication, testing & risk reduction | ||||
- 32% reduction in communication with household members to young people in households | ||||
- Greater involvement in collective action and social groups | ||||
- No impact on HIV incidence in wider community | ||||
- No difference in unprotected sex at last occurrence with non-spousal partner in past 12 months | ||||
- 11% increase in condom use | ||||
At last sex | ||||
- Microfinance (individual borrowing and repayment of loans over 10 or 20 week cycles) | ||||
- Participatory learning and action curriculum integrated into loan meetings (10 training sessions done within centre meetings every 2 weeks (approx. 6 months)) Community mobilization for 6 to 9 months following initial training | ||||
- HIV prevention education | ||||
3) The Tap & Reposition Youth (TRY)[24, 25], Kenya | Increased reproductive health & HIV knowledge Increased sexual negotiation skills Increased Income & savings | Pre-test, post-test design, with matched comparison (222 pairs), length of participation ranged from <1 year (n = 71), 1 to 2 years (n = 81) and 2 to 3 years (n = 70) | - A total of Out-of-school females aged 16-22 years | - Increase Savings |
- Group-based microfinance loans, Livelihoods skills training | ||||
- RH & HIV prevention training | ||||
- Increase in liberal attitudes towards gender roles | ||||
- Living in low income & slum areas of Nairobi | - 1.7 times more likely to refuse sex than girls in control group | |||
- 3 times more likely to insist on condom use than girls in control group | ||||
4) Incentivising safe sex: a randomised trial of conditional cash transfers for HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Tanzania[26] | To evaluate the use of conditional cash transfers as a HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention strategy to incentivise safe sex | An unblended, individually randomised controlled trial | - A sample of 2399 persons aged 18-30 years | - High value CCT arm v.s. controls: adjusted RR = 0.073 (95% CI 0.47-0.99) |
- Intervention arms: low value conditional cash transfer v.s., high value conditional cash transfer | - High value CCT arm v.s., low value CCT arm: RR = 0.76 (95% CI0.49 -0.92) | |||
- Significant reduction in the combined point prevalence of four curable STIs among high value CCT arm | ||||
- Tested participants every 4 months over a 12 months period for the presence of common STIs | ||||
5) Survival skills training for orphans (SSTOP)[27], Mozambique | To reduce transactional sex | Intervention: | - Females aged 14-19 years | Qualitative & anecdotal evidence found: |
- Responsible for | - Increased financial organization | |||
Income generating skills | caring for younger siblings, & other disadvantaged girls | - Increase vocational skills - Reduction in early marriage |
||
- Increased economic empowerment | ||||
- Girls aged 9-13 learned to make soap, candles, sewing, or knitting | - Reduction in early sexual activity without protection | |||
- Girls aged 14-19 attended sewing classes; HIV prevention education; & gender training including legal protection for women | ||||
6) Creating futures[28] (Durban, South Africa) | Objective 1: | Pilot intervention combining Stepping Stones and Creating Futures | - Piloted in urban informal settlements in with 232 young people (110 men, 122 women) | Objective 1: |
To strengthen young people’s livelihoods and economic power through reflection and action | ||||
- Livelihoods improved for women and men after the intervention | ||||
- The study design was an interrupted time-series design, with baseline measures at zero and two weeks and follow-ups at six and 12 months post-baseline. | ||||
- Average age of 21.7 years | ||||
- Mean earnings in the past month increased over the 12 months. For women this increased from US$14 at baseline to US$49 (a 345% increase (p < 0.0001)) at 12 months and for men from US$36 at baseline to US$104 (a 283% increase (p < 0.0001)) at 12 months | ||||
Objective 2: Aimed to reduce women’s experience and men’s perpetration of physical or sexual IPV | ||||
- Consisted of livelihoods and economic power intervention involving 21 sessions of three hours, delivered by trained peer facilitators | ||||
For objective 2: | ||||
Women reported a statistically significant reduction in their experience of sexual or physical IPV in the past three months from 29.9% at baseline to 18.9% at 12 months (a 37% reduction (p < 0.046) | ||||
- Women’s experience of sexual IPV also declined significantly from 11.1% at baseline to 3.6% at 12 months (p < 0.018) | ||||
- Men’s perpetration of physical or sexual IPV in the past 3 months, while declining from 25% to 21.9% (a 23% reduction) was not statistically | ||||
Significant | ||||
Economic empowerment plus school attendance | ||||
7) Zomba cash transfer[29], Malawi | Increased income Increased EducationReduce HIV risk | Randomised control trial, 2 years Cash transfers (CTs) conditional and on regular school attendance v.s. unconditional CTs (average amount US $10) | A sample of 1289 never married girls aged 13-22 years in 176 enumeration areas in Zomba | One-year follow-up: |
- Reduced onset of sexual activity by 31.1% | ||||
At 18 months follow-up: | ||||
- Intervention group had 64% reduction in HIV prevalence and 76% reduction in HSV-2 prevalence | ||||
- Reduced age of partners in those in intervention | ||||
- No significant differences between conditional and unconditional intervention group, although the study was not powered to show this | ||||
8) Western Kenya schooling intervention[30] | To reduce HIV incidence in schools | Randomised control trial, 4 years, Comparing 4 school-based HIV/AIDS interventions: | A sample of 70,000 school boys and girls in school | Teacher training: |
- No impact childbearing | ||||
- Increase in HIV knowledge If pregnant, more likely to be married | ||||
- Training teachers in HIV/AIDS curriculum | Critical thinking: | |||
- Increase knowledge & condom use | ||||
- Critical thinking on role of condoms | - No impact on sexual activitySchool uniforms: | |||
- Reduction in dropout rates 17% in boys, 14% in girls | ||||
- Reducing the cost of education by providing school uniforms | ||||
- Reduction in teen marriage 9% in girls | ||||
- Reduced childbearing 12%Relative risks: | ||||
- Relative risk campaign | ||||
- Reduction in childbearing 28% | ||||
- Increased sexual activity in boys | ||||
- No impact on pregnant teen couples | ||||
- Reduction in cross-generational pregnancies 61% | ||||
Gender empowerment and safe spaces for young people | ||||
9) Binti Pamoja Centre (Daughters United centre)[31, 32], Kenya | Create safe spaces for girls to reduce: violence, Female genital mutilation, Sexual abuse, Rape, Prostitution Poverty and Increase: Reproductive health knowledge, Financial education, Leadership & personal skills | Community intervention: | Girls aged 11-18 living in the Kibera slum | 2002 to present |
- Sampled adolescents from 4 ethically distinct villages in Kibera | - Baseline data highlights social isolation for many girls & 55% of girls live with neither or only one parent | |||
- Mapped all safe spaces in the community | ||||
- >30 safe spaces established reaching >1000 girls | ||||
- Used photography, drama, writing & group discussion | ||||
- Positive changes in social networks, mobility & gender norms | ||||
- Increased financial literacy, banking services usage, savings, & communication with parents/guardian on financial issues | ||||
- Peer education & empowerment workshops | ||||
- Developing skills in budgeting, savings, setting financial goals | ||||
- Increased confidence & positive self-esteem | ||||
- Provided educational scholarships | ||||
10) Siyakha Nentsha[33], South Africa | A life-orientation program to improve lifelong skills & well being of young people | Quasi-experimental, control arm, 18 month follow-up, 4 years Three study arms: | Boys & girls aged 14-16 in schools | - Increased autonomy for girls in how they spend their money & control their lives |
- Increased HIV related knowledge | ||||
- Young men had reduced onset of sexual activity and fewer partners | ||||
- SRH/HIV, social support, financial education | ||||
- SRH/HIV & social support | ||||
- Delayed Intervention (i.e. control group) | ||||
11) ICRW Vitu Newala[34], Tanzania | Understand specific vulnerabilities of adolescent girls and empower them, increase girls positive attitudes and beliefs on girls’ social protection | Pilot project Qualitative assessments throughout: | Adolescent girls | - Video parlours, discos & traditional initiation ceremonies identified as places where girls felt unsafe |
- Repeating the same participatory learning activities, | - Community put in place laws & changed practices to provide social protection | |||
- Series of IDIs with young people, | ||||
- An evaluation workshop | ||||
Comprehensive sexuality and behaviour change communication | ||||
12) Soul City Institute for health & development[35], South Africa | Increase: social change, Social mobilization, Advocacy and reduce HIV incidence | Promoting health & social change via TV, radio, & print Soul Buddyz: | Soul buddyz: | Soul City & Soul Buddys exposure |
- Spin off of Soul City TV series using edutainment | - Children aged 8-14 years, their teachers & their caregivers | - Increased: Self-perceptions on risk, Resistance to peer pressure | ||
One love: | ||||
- One love: Adults | ||||
- Statically significant shifts in social norms, especially sexual norms | ||||
- Reduced Perception of | ||||
- Challenged social norms on multiple & concurrent partnership | women’s dependence on men (68% vs. 61%, p < 0.05) | |||
13) Stepping Stones[36, 37], South Africa | Increase: Sexual health knowledge, Communication skills, Ccritical reflection and reduce Sexual health risk | Cluster randomised controlled trial, 2 years | A sample of 1077 HIV negative Persons aged 15-26 years, mostly attending school | - HIV IRR = 0.85 (95%CI: 0.60, 1.20; p = 0.35) |
- HSV2 IRR = 0.69 (95%CI: 0.47, 1.03; p = 0.07) | ||||
- 70 villages randomized to either 13 3-hour sessions and 3 peer group meetings, or a 3-hour session on safer sex and HIV. | ||||
- Men’s disclosure of perpetrating severe Intimate partner violence reduced at 12 & 24 months (p = 0.11 & p = 0.05) | ||||
- Reduced Problem drinking among men | ||||
Parenting and socialisation | ||||
14) Families Matter! (FMP),[38, 39], Kenya | Reduce age at first sex and increase ppositive parenting practices | Community-based intervention using parent-child dyads, 2 years (2004-2006) | 375 Parents/carers of 10-12 year-olds | - Increased Parenting skills & communication about sexuality & risk reduction |
Five consecutive 3-hour sessions on sexual risks and effective parent-child communication | - Parents’ attitudes regarding sexuality education changed positively. | |||
Five of the six composite parenting scores reported by parents, and six of six reported by children, increased significantly at 1 year post-intervention. | ||||
15) Mema kwa Jamii (Good Things for Communities, MkJ),[40, 41], Tanzania | Reduce SRH risks in youth through improved parenting | Community-based pilot parenting intervention, 2007-2010 | Approximately 1355 parents of young people aged 10-18 years | Qualitative indications of impact on: |
- Parents socialised their male children differently from female | ||||
Opinion leaders in four communities trained to training peer parents on parenting following diffusion of innovation theory over a period of 1 year | ||||
- Improved parent-child relationships and collective efficacy |