Table 2.
Neonatal mortality model
| Variables | (Model 0)n | (Model 1)‴ | (Model 2)^~ |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
| Residence type | |||
| Urban | Ref | Ref | |
| Rural | 1.36(1.13―1.65) | 1.30(1.07―1.58) | 1.32(1.06―1.64) |
| Household wealth index | |||
| Rich | Ref | ||
| Poor | 1.43(1.09―1.88) | ||
| Middle | 1.14(0.86―1.52) | ||
| Mother's education | |||
| Secondary or higher | Ref | ||
| No education | 1.26(1.01―1.56) | ||
| Primary | 1.20(0.94―1.52) | ||
| Mother's working status | |||
| Not working | Ref | ||
| Working | 0.76(0.64―0.91) | ||
| Mother's age | |||
| 40―49 | Ref | Ref | |
| < 20 | 3.14(2.09―4.70) | 3.17(2.12―4.74) | 3.16(2.12―4.74) |
| 20―29 | 1.11(0.81―1.51) | 1.22(0.90―1.66) | 1.22 0.90―1.65) |
| 30―39 | 0.90(0.64―1.24) | 0.99(0.71―1.37) | 0.98(0.71―1.36) |
| Mother's perceived baby size | |||
| Average or larger | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Small or very small | 1.95(1.63―2.34) | 1.86(1.55―2.24) | 1.86(1.55―2.24) |
| Sex | |||
| Female | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Male | 1.31(1.11―1.55) | 1.33(1.13―1.57) | 1.33(1.13―1.64) |
| Breastfeeding currently | |||
| Yes | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| No | 1.98(1.64―2.38) | 2.12(1.76―2.55) | 2.12(1.75―2.55) |
| Location of kitchen | |||
| Separate building | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Outdoors | 0.88(0.68―1.15) | ||
| House | 1.15(0.92―1.44) | ||
| Cooking fuel | |||
| Non-Solid fuel | Ref | Ref | |
| Solid fuel | 1.16(0.91―1.47) | 1.01(0.73―1.26) |
^Independent variables adjusted were: place of residence, wealth index, child size, child’s gender, currently. Breastfeeding and mother’s (education, working status, age); nModel 0 – unadjusted independent variables; ‴Model 1 – independent variables associated with neonatal mortality; Model 2 – Model 1 plus type of cooking fuels; ~Missing values were excluded from model 0, 1, and 2.