Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140004. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0004

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of ADEPD-cost scores and correlation between ranking from ADEPD score and ranking from ADEPD-cost score. There is a non-significant correlation between ADEPD and ADEPD-cost rankings for the top 20 species (r = 0.243, p = 0.301), but a significant correlation for all 206 species (r = 0.321, p < 0.001).