Table 10.
Disturbance analysis of Neobuxbaumia tetetzo populations in tetechera forest under different fruit gathering rates
Proportion of fruits gathered | r2 | r3 | Fecundity r4 | r5 | r6 | λ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 8.70 | 14.90 | 22.40 | 28.20 | 29.30 | 1.077 |
10% | 7.83 | 13.41 | 20.16 | 25.38 | 26.37 | 1.075 |
20% | 6.96 | 11.92 | 17.92 | 22.56 | 23.44 | 1.073 |
30% | 6.09 | 10.43 | 15.68 | 19.74 | 20.51 | 1.070 |
40% | 5.22 | 8.94 | 13.44 | 16.92 | 17.58 | 1.066 |
50% | 4.35 | 7.45 | 11.20 | 14.10 | 14.65 | 1.063 |
60% | 3.48 | 5.96 | 8.96 | 11.28 | 11.72 | 1.058 |
70% | 2.61 | 4.47 | 6.72 | 8.46 | 8.79 | 1.053 |
80% | 1.74 | 2.98 | 4.48 | 5.64 | 5.86 | 1.046 |
90% | 0.87 | 1.49 | 2.24 | 2.82 | 2.93 | 1.035 |
95% | 0.44 | 0.75 | 1.12 | 1.41 | 1.47 | 1.025 |
100% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.960 |
Columns indicate the fecundity rates in reproductive individual plants (r2 to r6) determined by different gathering regimes and their effect in λ values.