Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 24;41(10):101705. doi: 10.1118/1.4894701

TABLE III.

The percentage target dose degradation %ΔD98,95 for CTV prostate (P) and CTV SV (S) for zero-PTV-margin plan, and the optimized PTV margins obtained by CPOM technique across 19 patients.

ID Zero-PTV-plan %ΔD98,95(%) CPOM PTV(mm)
1 P: 4.9 S: 14.5 P: 2 S: 8
2 P: 5.8 S: 6.4 P: 10 S: 5
3 P: 5.3 S: 1.3 P: 5 S: 3
4 P: 7.7 S: 14.4 P: 5 S: 3
5 P: 1.3 S: 8.5 P: 2 S: 6
6 P: 0.8 S: 8.5 P: 1 S: 3
7 P: 2.2 S: 0.0 P: 2 S: 0
8 P: 1.7 S: 0.0 P: 4 S: 3
9 P: 2.9 S: 16.9 P: 6 S: 18
10 P: 11.1 S: 24.7 P: 7 S: 15
11 P: 9.5 S: 0.0 P: 9 S: 0
12 P: 7.5 S: 9.8 P: 9 S: 5
13 P: 2.7 S: 31.4 P: 5 S: 4
14 P: 0.8 S: 32.9 P: 4 S: 8
15 P: 0.8 S: 0.0 P: 1 S: 0
16 P: 2.4 S: 0.0 P: 2 S: 2
17 P: 3.1 S: 24.8 P: 3 S: 5
18 P: 2.6 S: 4.6 P: 4 S: 4
19 P: 0.7 S: 0.0 P: 2 S: 0