Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 24;2014:194047. doi: 10.1155/2014/194047

Table 4.

Methodological quality of complementary and traditional medicine RCTs in Korea according to Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias n (%)*.

Risk of bias Natural products Mind and body practices Total (n = 360)
Herbal medicine (n = 30) Ginseng therapy (n = 19) Vitamin diet-based therapy (n = 5) Acupuncture (n = 144) Pharmacoacupuncture (n = 70) Qigong
magnet (n = 31)
Tuina technique (n = 17) Moxibustion therapy (n = 12) Massage (n = 10) Taping technique (n = 7) Cupping therapy (n = 5) Meditation
tai-chi
yoga
aroma therapy (n = 10)
(1) Random sequence generation 18 (60.0) 11 (57.9) 1 (20.0) 65 (45.1) 34 (48.6) 2 (6.5) 5 (29.4) 4 (33.3) 3 (30.0) 3 (42.9) 1 (20.0) 3 (30.0) 150 (41.7)
(2) Allocation concealment 3 (10.0) 7 (36.8) 0 17 (11.8) 3 (4.3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 (8.3)
(3) Blinding of participants and personnel
 Patients 23 (76.7) 17 (89.5) 3 (60.0) 47 (32.6) 30 (42.9) 4 (12.9) 0 1 (8.3) 1 (10.0) 1 (14.3) 0 0 123 (34.2)
 Doctor 22 (73.3) 16 (84.2) 3 (60.0) 18 (25.7) 59 (16.4)
(4) Blinding of outcome assessment 22 (73.3) 14 (73.7) 3 (60.0) 27 (18.8) 8 (11.4) 3 (9.7) 0 0 2 (20.0) 1 (14.3) 1 (20.0) 0 81 (22.5)
(5) Incomplete outcome data 27 (90.0) 15 (78.9) 5 (100.0) 42 (29.2) 30 (42.9) 9 (29.0) 2 (11.8) 9 (75.0) 5 (50.0) 7 (100.0) 3 (60.0) 6 (60.0) 160 (44.4)
(6) Selective reporting 2 (6.7) 3 (15.8) 0 3 (2.1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 (2.2)

*Low risk of bias, n (%).