Table 2.
Recognition accuracy by n-fold cross validation procedure for different feature extraction techniques for SVM classification for the TG dataset.
Feature sets | n = 5 | n = 6 | n = 7 | n = 8 | n = 9 | n = 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PF1 [23] | 38.1 | 38.4 | 38.6 | 38.7 | 38.8 | 38.8 |
PF2 [23] | 38.0 | 38.4 | 38.5 | 38.6 | 38.7 | 38.8 |
PF [24] | 42.3 | 42.6 | 42.7 | 43.0 | 43.0 | 43.1 |
O [21] | 35.8 | 36.1 | 36.2 | 36.1 | 36.3 | 36.3 |
AAC [5] | 31.5 | 31.5 | 31.7 | 31.8 | 31.9 | 32.0 |
AAC+HXPZV [5] | 35.7 | 36.0 | 36.1 | 36.2 | 36.3 | 36.3 |
ACC [29] | 64.9 | 65.4 | 65.9 | 66.2 | 66.4 | 66.4 |
PSSM+PF1 [55] | 51.1 | 51.5 | 52.0 | 52.3 | 52.4 | 52.7 |
PSSM+PF2 [55] | 50.2 | 50.4 | 50.7 | 50.8 | 51.0 | 51.1 |
PSSM+PF [55] | 57.2 | 57.8 | 58.0 | 58.3 | 58.5 | 58.8 |
PSSM+O [55] | 46.0 | 46.3 | 46.5 | 46.5 | 46.7 | 46.7 |
PSSM+AAC [55] | 43.2 | 43.5 | 43.6 | 43.8 | 43.8 | 44.0 |
PSSM+AAC+HXPZV [55] | 45.6 | 45.9 | 46.0 | 46.2 | 46.3 | 46.6 |
Mono-gram [19] | 57.2 | 57.3 | 58.2 | 58.4 | 58.8 | 58.8 |
Bi-gram [19] | 67.1 | 67.5 | 67.6 | 67.8 | 68.1 | 68.1 |
k -AAP (this paper) | 75.9 | 76.2 | 76.6 | 76.7 | 76.9 | 77.0 |