Table 2.
The performance of eleven scoring methods in predicting essential proteins, evaluated by the precision of essential proteins in the top ranked list.
Top | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local-based Method | |||||||||||
MCC | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.71 | |
DMNC | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.54 | |
MNC | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.50 | |
Degree | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.44 | |
Global-based Method | |||||||||||
EPC | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.39 | |
BottleNeck | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.43 | |
EcCentricity | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.39 | |
Closeness | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.48 | |
Radiality | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.48 | |
Betweenness | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.43 | |
Stress | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.43 |