Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 8;8(Suppl 4):S11. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11

Table 2.

The performance of eleven scoring methods in predicting essential proteins, evaluated by the precision of essential proteins in the top ranked list.

Top 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Local-based Method
MCC 0.90 0.90 0.87 0.82 0.76 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.70 0.71
DMNC 0.80 0.80 0.73 0.68 0.64 0.58 0.54 0.53 0.56 0.54
MNC 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.47 0.48 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.51 0.50
Degree 0.70 0.55 0.47 0.42 0.46 0.47 0.49 0.47 0.46 0.44
Global-based Method
EPC 0.50 0.50 0.47 0.45 0.48 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.39
BottleNeck 0.60 0.60 0.43 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.43
EcCentricity 0.30 0.45 0.40 0.45 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.41 0.37 0.39
Closeness 0.50 0.45 0.47 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.48
Radiality 0.50 0.35 0.43 0.50 0.48 0.43 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.48
Betweenness 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.46 0.43
Stress 0.60 0.55 0.43 0.47 0.46 0.48 0.49 0.45 0.42 0.43