Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 1;171(24):5774–5789. doi: 10.1111/bph.12877

Table 2.

Efficacy and potency of OEA on wild-type GPR119 and receptor mutants as well as the potency fold change between wild type and mutants (Fmut)

Mutant Emax OEA EC50 Fmut n
(%) SEM Log SEM nM
Wild type 97 2.0 −6.54 0.13 290 7
Binding pocket
 GlnII:24Ala (65) 101 5.6 −6.23 0.26 596 3.5 3
 ArgIII:04Ala (81) 34* 2.4 −5.83 0.12 1470 8.6 3
 MetIII:05Ala (82) 26* 1.5 −6.01 0.08 975 5.7 3
 ValIII:08Ala (85) 97 3.4 −6.18 0.12 663 3.9 3
 ThrIII:09Ala (86) 37* 2.1 −6.11 0.20 784 2.0 4
 ThrIII:09Val (86) 63* 8.7 −6.59 0.77 257 0.67 4
 AlaIII:12Val (89) 116 19.0 −5.80 0.42 1600 4.1 4
 ValV:05Ala (166) 69 13.0 −6.07 0.88 861 2.2 3
 SerV:09Ala (170) 120 16.0 −6.73 0.65 185 0.5 4
 SerV:09Val (170) 47* 17.0 −5.76 0.70 1760 4.6 4
 TrpVI:13Ala (238) 3
 PheVI:16Ala (241) 3
 GlyVI:20Val (245) 80 2.6 −6.58 0.28 262 1.5 3
 GlnVI:23Ala (248) 73 8.4 −5.90 0.39 1270 3.3 3
 GluVII:02Ala (261) 71 9.2 −5.69 0.28 2040 12.0 3
 ArgVII:03Ala (262) 20* 2.7 −5.54 0.17 2860 17.0 3
 TrpVII:06Ala (265) 4
 GlyVII:09Val (268) 43* 2.5 −5.79 0.30 1630 9.6 3
ECL-2b
 PheC+2Ala (157) 3
 PheC+3Ala (158) 19* 2.9 –5.12 0.51 7816 21.0 4

Statistically significant changes from wild type are marked with an asterisk

(*).

Residue positions are given in parentheses after the Schwartz/Baldwin name.