Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;53(1):212–218. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02332-14

TABLE 2.

Comparison of outbreak delineations of different subtyping methodsa

Outbreak Result by:
WGST MLVA CRISPR-MLVST PFGE
A ++ + +
B ++ + + ++
C ++ ++ + ++
D ++ ++ + +
E ++ + + +
F ++ ++ ++ +
G ++ ++ ++ ++
H ++ + + +
I ++ ++ + +
J ++ + +
K ++ +
L ++ ++ ++ +
M ++ + + +
N ++ + +
O ++ + +
P ++ + +
a

Symbols are used to report evaluations of subtyping methods. ++, isolates from the outbreak formed a cluster, and the cluster did not include isolates from other outbreaks or sporadic cases; +, isolates from the outbreak clustered with each other but also with isolates from other outbreaks or sporadic cases; −, isolates from the outbreak did not form a cluster.