Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 11;5(1):49–59. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.015040

Table 1. Quantitation of development time for data in Figure 2.

Condition Time to Median Eclosion (d) Difference (d)
control 11.67 ± 0.08 N/A
3% ethanol 11.75 ± 0.05 +0.08 (not significant)
7.4 mM H2O2 12.28 ± 0.08 +0.61 (P < 0.01)
8.8 mM H2O2 11.78 ± 0.06 +0.11 (not significant)
3% ethanol + 8.8 mM H2O2 12.57 ± 0.09 +0.9 (P < 0.01, all comparisons)
10.3 mM H2O2 13.15 ± 0.14 +1.48 (P < 0.01)
11.8 mM H2O2 13.33 ± 0.17 +1.66 (P < 0.01)
3% ethanol + 11.8 mM H2O2 14.48 ± 0.17 +2.81 (P < 0.01, all comparisons)

Data are presented as time to median eclosion ± SEM. “Difference” is time to median eclosion for the untreated control minus time to median eclosion for the indicated experimental treatment. For single treatments, P values indicate a comparison between the untreated control and the treatment. For combinations of ethanol and peroxide, comparisons were made between untreated controls as well as each of the single treatment controls. One-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post-hoc analysis.