Table 1. Quantitation of development time for data in Figure 2.
Condition | Time to Median Eclosion (d) | Difference (d) |
---|---|---|
control | 11.67 ± 0.08 | N/A |
3% ethanol | 11.75 ± 0.05 | +0.08 (not significant) |
7.4 mM H2O2 | 12.28 ± 0.08 | +0.61 (P < 0.01) |
8.8 mM H2O2 | 11.78 ± 0.06 | +0.11 (not significant) |
3% ethanol + 8.8 mM H2O2 | 12.57 ± 0.09 | +0.9 (P < 0.01, all comparisons) |
10.3 mM H2O2 | 13.15 ± 0.14 | +1.48 (P < 0.01) |
11.8 mM H2O2 | 13.33 ± 0.17 | +1.66 (P < 0.01) |
3% ethanol + 11.8 mM H2O2 | 14.48 ± 0.17 | +2.81 (P < 0.01, all comparisons) |
Data are presented as time to median eclosion ± SEM. “Difference” is time to median eclosion for the untreated control minus time to median eclosion for the indicated experimental treatment. For single treatments, P values indicate a comparison between the untreated control and the treatment. For combinations of ethanol and peroxide, comparisons were made between untreated controls as well as each of the single treatment controls. One-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post-hoc analysis.