Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 7;134(2):247–257. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1517-2

Table 2.

Variants showing nominal association with DR (P uncorrected < 0.05) in the current study among the SNPs previously associated with DR

Phenotype SNP Chr Position A1 A2 Original association Closest gene Meta-analysis (WESDR + DCCT/EDIC) Discovery vs. replication
OR P References FRQ OR (95 % CI) P meta* Direction P Het
SDR rs39059 7 29,221,995 A G 1.29 2.6E−04 Hu et al. (2011) CHN2 0.63 0.78 (0.65–0.94) 8.6E−03 −−−− 0.36 +−
SDR rs1571942 10 20,582,640 A G 0.60 3.5E−07 Huang et al. (2011) PLXDC2 0.85 0.71 (0.55–0.91) 6.4E−03 −−−− 0.67 −−
SDR rs12219125 10 20,633,093 T G 1.62 9.3E−09 Huang et al. (2011) PLXDC2 0.15 1.40 (1.10–1.79) 7.2E−03 ++++ 0.84 ++
MDR rs1801282 3 12,368,125 G C 0.81 3.0E−02 Ma et al. (2012) PPARG 0.13 0.73 (0.57–0.93) 9.7E−03 −+−−− 0.004 −−

Chr chromosome, Position physical position based on hg18, A1/A2 effect/other alleles, OR odds ratio for the effect allele, P the association P value in the original GWAS, FRQ effect allele frequency, P meta P value in the case–control meta-analysis unadjusted for multiple testing, Direction direction of effect in participating studies in this meta-analysis with this order, SDR WESDR, DCCT/EDIC primary cohort, secondary cohort—conventional treatment, secondary cohort—intensive treatment, MDR WESDR, DCCT/EDIC PRI cohort—conv. Rx, PRI cohort—intensive Rx, SEC cohort—conv. Rx, SEC cohort—intensive Rx, P Het P value of Cochran’s Q test for heterogeneity, Discovery vs. replication direction of effect in the original report (discovery) is compared with the current study (replication)

* The significance threshold adjusting for the effective number of test is P < 1.5 × 10−3