. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 13.

Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):721–727. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0523-z

Table 4.

Contextual analysis of the dot location task

		Latent Reference Factors
Target Variable	Age	Gf	Memory	Speed	Vocab
Single-dot	−.12	−.36^*	.06	−.27^*	.07
Single-dot	−.09	−.41^*	.07	−.22^*	.09
Three-dot 1	−.09	−.36^*	.01	−.22^*	−.11
Three-dot 1	−.09	−.53^*	.06	−.12	−.03
Three-dot 2	−.09	−.31^*	−.10	−.21^*	−.03
Three-dot 2	−.11	−.56^*	−.04	−.09	.09
Three-dot 3	−.07	−.14	−.20	−.21^*	.05
Three-dot 3	−.11	−.41^*	−.14	−.11	.17

Note. The values reflect standardized regression coefficients when the target variable is simultaneously predicted by age and the reference constructs. For each target variable, the first row of numbers reflects the relationship among the constructs and the target variable when the Gf construct consists of spatial and verbal tasks. The second row of numbers reflects those relationships when the Gf construct consists of only verbal tasks.

p < .01