TABLE 3.
Results of multivariable analyses of variance for all isolates (model 1), farmed animals (models 2 to 4), and a combination of isolates from small wild mammals with each farmed species (models 5 to 10) (Dong Thap, Vietnam, 2012 and 2013)a
| Model | Isolateb | Factor | R2d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | All isolates | Animal typec | 0.26 |
| 2 | Chicken | Farm | 0.55 |
| 3 | Duck | Farm | 0.43 |
| 4 | Pig | Farm | 0.41 |
| 5 | Chicken and SM-F | Chickens vs. SM-F | 0.14 |
| 6 | Chicken and SM-O | Chickens vs. SM-O | 0.25 |
| 7 | Ducks and SM-F | Ducks vs. SM-F | 0.19 |
| 8 | Ducks and SM-O | Ducks vs. SM-O | 0.32 |
| 9 | Pigs and SM-F | Pigs vs. SM-F | 0.30 |
| 10 | Pigs and SM-O | Pigs vs. SM-O | 0.45 |
All P values were <0.05.
SM-F, small wild mammals trapped on farms; SM-O, small wild mammals trapped at nonfarm sites.
Pig, chicken, or duck.
R2, variance.