Table 3.
Challenge | Methods of addressing challenge |
---|---|
Agenda-setting: For a research collaboration such as UINCD, the issue of where the decision-makers are physically located and who sets the research agenda needs to be explicitly discussed. | • GHLI facilitated workshops on leadership and communication skills. • US- and Uganda-based collaborators have held weekly conference calls that help maintain open lines of communication and to bridge the physical distance. • The 2014 Forum focused on organizational structure, internal reporting, and a clearer description of individual roles and responsibilities. |
Sharing academic credit: In a framework in which roles and responsibilities are shared, academic credit too must be shared. How do we explicitly negotiate these roles to maintain parity? | • Explicit discussions about authorship are had between collaborators at the outset of projects. • All protocols and research documents undergo joint review by US-based and Uganda-based co-investigators. • The research group strives for balance in authorship of documents, protocols, and grant applications. |
Funding: In an equitable collaboration, through what channels does the funding stream? As granting agencies increasingly desire LMIC-based principal investigators (PIs), how do we maintain financial support for US-based collaborators? | • Though it remains unclear where UINCD will be most successful at finding funding, non-traditional sources of funding, such as in the Ugandan private sector, will need to be sought. • A diversification of funding streams must be pursued because funding options that only allow LMIC-based PIs pose a challenge to HIC-based investigators whose institutions place high value on the acquisition of grant dollars. |
Stakeholder engagement: Work related to NCDs involves more stakeholders than disease-specific trials or epidemiologic studies. How do we balance the interests of multiple stakeholder groups and work together to translate scientific results into policy and systemic change? | • UINCD must think broadly about what defines a stakeholder group and specifically aim to include communities often left out of the NCD arena, such as those addressing injury/disability and mental health. • UINCD must engage with stakeholders early and re-engage with them often. |
Balancing research and clinical care priorities: Is UINCD primarily focused on research or patient care? | • Recalling that the original concept of UINCD formed from observing patient care experiences and a desire to improve patient care. • Agreement that UINCD does not intend to set up a separate healthcare structure, but rather to test models of care that could be rolled out by partner organizations. |
GHLI: Yale Global Health Leadership Institute; HIC: high-income country; LMIC: low- and middle-income country; NCD: non-communicable disease; PI: principal investigator; UINCD: Uganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-communicable Diseases.