| Satisfaction with practical dimension (9
items) |
|
0,891 |
|
|
Global satisfaction with
practical classes |
0.756 |
|
|
|
Learning achieved |
0.659 |
|
|
|
Motivation to attend practical
classes |
0.602 |
|
|
|
Dynamics of practical
classes |
0.581 |
|
|
|
Active participation in the
scenarios developed |
0.709 |
|
|
|
Interaction with
colleagues |
0.641 |
|
|
|
Interaction with teachers |
0.688 |
|
|
|
Satisfaction with scenarios’
level of difficulty |
0.591 |
|
|
|
Productivity during practical
classes |
0.682 |
|
| Satisfaction with realism dimension (5
items) |
|
0.888 |
|
|
Realism of the scenarios
developed |
0.677 |
|
|
|
Credibility during the
scenario |
0.645 |
|
|
|
Quality of the material used in
the practicums |
0.805 |
|
|
|
Quality of the equipment used
in the practicums |
0.793 |
|
|
|
Quality of the simulators |
0.740 |
|
| Satisfaction with cognitive dimension (3
items) |
|
0.736 |
|
|
Satisfaction with
debriefing |
0.374 |
|
|
|
Link between scenarios and
theory |
0.723 |
|
|
|
Appropriateness to themes
developed in TP classes |
0.618 |
|
| Global coefficient of the Scale |
|
0.914 |
