Table 2.

Neuropsychological Traits for Individual Participants and by Group

Stage-1 Group
Part	Moa	Aqb	Typc	Repd	z	CaCe	z	PNVTf	z	Syng	z	Aph
S1	54	79	A	100	0.94	55	−1.38	88	−0.11	57	−1.31	none
S2	10	60	A	95	0.61	61	−0.97	75	−1.02	60	−1.13	none
S3	59	64	W	90	0.29	59	−1.10	78	−0.81	67	−0.71	none
S4	24	44	W	92	0.42	38	−2.53	56	−2.35	37	−2.49	none
S5	54	54	W	91	0.35	53	−1.51	54	−2.49	33	−2.73	none
Ave.	40	60		94	0.52	53	−1.50	70	−1.35	51	−1.67

Stage-2 Group
Part	Moa	Aqb	Typc	Repd	z	CaCe	z	PNVTf	z	Syng	z	Aph
P1	34	89	A	74	−0.77	78	0.19	98	0.59	93	0.83	none
P2	55	68	B	79	−0.44	81	0.39	100	0.73	87	0.47	mod to sev
P3	33	56	C	87	0.09	92	1.14	99	0.66	93	0.83	none
P4	24	65	C	65	−1.36	80	0.32	98	0.59	80	0.06	mild
P5	87	71	C	94	0.55	80	0.32	98	0.59	80	0.06	none
P6	11	77	C	66	−1.29	70	−0.36	94	0.31	93	0.83	none
Ave.	41	71		78	−0.54	80	0.33	98	0.58	88	0.51

Note. Part = participant; z = z scores calculated from the mean and standard deviation of a large diverse group of individuals (N = 107) diagnosed with aphasia resulting from left-hemisphere stroke.

^aMonths post onset;

^bWestern Aphasia Battery quotient (Kertesz, 1982);

^cAphasia type, where A = anomic, W = Wernicke’s, B = Broca’s, C = Conduction;

^dWord repetition test (in percentages);

^eCamels and Cactus Test (Bozeat et al., 2000), test of nonverbal semantic comprehension (in percentages);

^fPNVT = Semantic subtest of the picture-word verification test (Mirman et al., 2010), a measure of word comprehension (in percentages);

^gSynonym selection task (Martin et al., 2006), a measure of word comprehension (nouns and verbs);

^hSpeech motor apraxia severity.