Skip to main content
. 2004 May;135(1):201–211. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.039453

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Variability of morphological pleiotropy in early flowering mutants under SD. A, Distribution of morphological changes in eav1 to eav61 T-DNA insertion mutants. Empty and filled boxes indicate, respectively, the absence and presence of macroscopically detectable morphological changes. B, Frequency of changes in 28 morphological parameters. Elongation of hypocotyl (1) and petiole (2). Rosette size (3), raising (4), and pigmentation (5). Rosette leaf shape (6), serration (7), surface (8), and trichomes (9). Cauline leaf size (10), shape (11), serration (12), and surface (13). Flower size (14) and number (15). Perianth organ shape (16) and reproductive organ shape (17). Silique size (18), shape (19), and fertility (20). Floral stem elongation (21), length of first internode (22), length of other internodes (23), thickness (24), and appendage arrangement (25). Coflorescence elongation (26), number of secondary inflorescence (27), and secondary inflorescence elongation (28).