Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 22;141(2):323–331. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1800-6

Table 3.

Unified response rates of advanced thymic carcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimens

Regimen Author, year Study design Stage No. of patients Responders RR PFS (mos) MST (mos)
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy
ADOC Agatsuma et al. (2011) S IVa/IVb 34 17 50 % N/A 21.3
CODE Yoh et al. (2003) S III/IVa/IVb 12 5 42 % 5.6 46
VIP Grassin et al. (2011) S III/IVa/IVb 8 2 25 %
CDDP/DTXa Park et al. (2013) G III/IVa 18 12 66.7 %
CDDP/CPT-11 Present study S IVa/IVb/rec 12 9 75.0 % 7.4 52.4
Total 84 45 53.6 %
Carboplatin-based chemotherapy
CarboPTX Lemma et al. (2011) G III/IVa/IVb 23 5 21.7 % 5.0 20.0
CarboPTX Igawa et al. (2010) S IVa/IVb 11 4 36 % 7.9 22.7
CarboPTX Takeda et al. (2013) G III/IVa/IVb 39 14 35.9 % 7.52 Not reached
CarboPTX Furugen et al. (2011) S IVa/IVb/rec 16 6 37.5 % 8.6 49.4
CarboAMRa Kawashima et al. (2013) G Invasivea 33 11 30 % 7.6 27.3
Total 122 40 32.8 %

G prospective multicenter group phase II trial, S single-center experience, RR response rate, PFS progression-free survival, OS overall survival, ADOC adriamycin, cisplatin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide, CODE adriamycin, cisplatin, vincristine and etoposide, CarboAMR carboplatin and amrubicin, CarboPTX carboplatin and paclitaxel, CDDP/CPT-11 cisplatin and irinotecan, CDDP/DTX cisplatin/docetaxel

aThe subset for thymic carcinoma