Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2014 Oct;21(4):608–629. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.919824

Table 5.

Alternative Latent Curve Results from Fitting Univariate Dual Change Score Model to Different Scalings of Grade Point Averages (GPAs) (Ordinal GPA*)

Parameters & Fit (a)
Interval
GPA
Linear
Change
(b)
Interval
GPA
AR(1)
Change
(c)
Interval
GPA
Dual
Change
(d)
Ordinal
GPA*
Linear
Change
(e)
Ordinal
GPA*
AR(1)
Change
(f)
Ordinal
GPA*
Dual
Change
Fixed Effects
Mean intercept, µ0 2.65 (211) 2.69 (201) 2.68 (210) =0 =0 =0
Mean slope, µ1 0.09 (17.) =0 −1.79 (3.3) 0.14 (14) =0 0.07 (4.6)
Constant change, α =1 =0 =1 =1 =0 =1
Proportion change, β =0 0.037 (15) 0.69 (3.4) =0 =0.69 (3.2) 0.84 (3.3)
Scaling coefficients, T =1 =1 =1 −1.8, −;1.3
−.70, −.30
.06, .66
1.2, 1.8
−2.0, −;1.5
−.77, −.31
.07, .75
1.3, 2.0
−1.9, −;1.4
−.80, −.30
.03, .67
1.2, 1.9
Variable Intercepts, µ =0 −0.07 (3.6) =0 =0 0.16 (15) =0
Random Effects
Intercept Variance, σ02 0.42 (25) 0.42 (25) 0.40 (25) =1 = 1 =1
Slope variance, σ12 0.02 (5.1) =0 1.22 (2.1) 0.04 (6.3) =0 0.78 (1.81)
Common slope-level, σ01 −0.05 (7) =0 −0.29 (4.1) −0.11 (8.7) =0 −.88 (−3.6)
Unique variance, ψ2 .22 (35) .027 (38) .22 (35) 0.48 (18) 0.70 (27) 0.53 (18)
Residual Variance, σe2 =0 −0.03 (5.7) =0 =0 −0.05 (2.9) =0
Goodness of Fit
Misfit index χ2 / df 48./8 114./8 24./7 174./26 246./26 94./25
Change in fit Δχ2 / Δdf 350./3 284./3 24./1; 90./1 985./3 913./3 80/1; 152./1
WLSM scaling factor κ 1 1 1 0.723 0.739 0.651

RMSEA ε .027 .044 .019 .029 .034 .020

Note: Weighted least squares mean (WLSM) estimator based on weighted least squares plus mean adjusted variances. Sample size N=6,896, 15 patterns of incomplete data; Level Only Baseline for the two scalings are GPA=398/11 with ε=0.071, and GPA

*

=1159/29, κ=0.871, ε=0.075. Obtain Technical Appendix (from authors) for Mplus input and output. AR = autoregression. Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = RMSEA.