Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2014 Oct;21(4):608–629. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.919824

Table 6.

Alternative Latent Curve Results from Fitting Univariate Dual Change Score Model to Interval and Ordinal Scalings of the Weighted Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (WCESD) Scale (rescaled version of 13 items of Factor 1)

Parameters & Fit (a)
Interval
WCESD
No AR
Change
(b)
Interval
WCESD
AR(1)
Change
(c)
Interval
WCESD
Dual
Change
(d)
Ordinal
WCESD*
Linear
Change
(e)
Ordinal
WCESD*
AR(1)
Change
(f)
Ordinal
WCESD*
Dual Change
Fixed Effects
Mean intercept, µ0 1.48 (91) 1.60 (100) 1.47 (103) =0 =0 =0
Mean slope, µ1 −0.03 (4.3) =0 −1.48 (−9.1) −0.46 (2.5) =0 −0.04 (1.5)
Constant change, α =1 =0 =1 =1 =0 =1
Proportion change, β =0 −0.13 (4.0) 0.03 (0.8) =0 −0.07 (2.0) 0.03 (0.4)
Scaling coefficients, T =1 =1 =1 0.5, 1.4
2.0,
2.7, 3.6
0.5, 1.4
2.0
2.6, 3.4
0.5, 1.4
2.0
2.7, 3.6
Variable Intercepts, µ =0 0.18 (3.4) =0 =0 −0.05 (2.6) =0
Random Effects
Intercept Variance, σ02 0.57 (20) 0.51 (15) 0.53 (22) =1 =1 =1
Slope Variance, σ12 0.01 (1.2) =0 0.56 (17) 0.011 (0.6) =0 0.10 (0.3)
Common slope-level, σ01 −0.04 (20) =0 −0.54 (20) −0.04 (1.1) =0 −0.30 (0.5)
Unique Variance, ψ2 0.49 (38) 0.44 (19) 0.50 (37) 0.78 (8.8) 0.67 (7.0) 0.77 (9.7)
Residual Variance, σe2 =0 0.06 (2.0) =0 =0 0.11 (1.7) =0
Goodness of Fit
Misfit index χ2 / df 31.3 / 8 21.9 / 8 29.2 / 7 13.7 / 17 10.7 / 17 13.8 / 16
Change in fit Δχ2 / Δdf 42.7 / 3 51.1 / 3 1.9/1; −8.3/1 47.3 / 3 50.3 / 3 −0.1/1;−2.9/1
WLSM scaling factor κ 1 1 1 0.772 0.796 0.734

RMSEA ε 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: Weighted least squares mean (WLSM) estimator based on weighted least squares plus mean adjusted variances. Sample size N=6,942, 15 patterns of incomplete data; Level Only Baseline for the two scalings are WCESD=74./11 with ε=0.03, and WCESD

*

=61./20, m=0.900, ε=0.02; AR = auto-regression; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = RMSEA.