Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2014 Oct;21(4):608–629. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.919824

Table 7.

Dynamic Structural Equation Model (SEM) Results from a Bivariate Dual Change Score Model for Interval and Ordinal Scalings of Grade Point Averages (GPAs) and Weighted Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (WCESD) Scale, including Alternative Misfits

(a) Interval Scaling (b) Ordinal* Scaling

Parameters GPA WCESD GPA* WCESD*
Fixed Effects
Mean intercept, µ0 2.68 (202) 1.48 (81) =0 (=0) =0 (=0)
Mean slope, µ1 −0.66 (−.58) 0.45 (.35) 0.026 (1.00) −0.052 (−2.34)
Constant change, α =1 =1 =1 =1
Proportional change, β 0.607 (2.57) 0.140 (.22) 0.109 (0.27) 0.010 (−0.02)
Coupling, γ GPA → WCESD 0.25 (−1.05) 0.074 (−0.37)
Coupling, γ WCESD → GPA 0.63 (−1.19) 2.170 (−2.57)
Scaling coefficients, T −1.8, −1.4, −0.7,
−0.3, 0.01, 0.6,
1.1, 1.7
0.5, 1.4,
2.0,
2.7, 3.6
Random Effects
Intercept variance, σ02 0.40 (24) 0.56 (15) =1 (=0) =1 (=0)
Slope variance, σ12 0.44 (1.2) 0.05 (.38) 4.58 (1.3) 0.01 (0.71)
Cova. Slope & Level, σ01 −0.31 (3.7) −0.12 (.39) −0.45 (−1.5) −0.03 (−0.07)
Unique variance, ψ2 0.22 (35) 0.49 (35) 0.43 (14.7) 0.81 (13.1)
Goodness-of-Fit
“Dual Coupling” Misfit 55.9 / 23 / 0.014 82.6 / 50 / 0.009
“No GPA→ WCESD” 56.7 / 24 / 0.014 82.0 / 51 / 0.009
“No WCESD→ GPA” 57.7 / 24 / 0.014 113. / 51 / 0.013
“No Couplings” Misfit 58.0 / 25 / 0.014 111. / 52 / 0.013
“No Cross-Lags” Misfit 83.0 / 27 / 0.017 191. / 54 / 0.019
“No Slopes” Misfit 168. / 32 / 0.024 1172. / 59 / 0.060

Notes: “Dual” model sample size is N=7,258 with 130 patterns of incomplete data; Ordinal ω4= .725; Not all model parameters are listed here; Obtain Technical Appendix (from authors) for Mplus input and output.