Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 14;21(2):571–577. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.571

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis n (%)

Factor for lymph node metastasis Presence (n = 104) Absence (n = 1000) P value
Age (yr) 0.049
< 60 61 (58.7) 485 (48.5)
≥ 60 43 (41.3) 515 (51.5)
Gender 0.003
Male 53 (51.0) 656 (65.6)
Female 51 (49.0) 344 (34.4)
Size of tumor (mm) < 0.0001
< 20 mm 9 (8.7) 370 (37.0)
≥ 20 mm 95 (91.3) 630 (63.0)
Location 0.389
Upper third 9 (8.7) 116 (11.6)
Middle third 36 (34.6) 289 (28.9)
Lower third 59 (56.7) 595 (59.5)
Macroscopic type < 0.0001
Elevated 7 (6.7) 78 (7.8)
Flat 1 (1.0) 80 (8)
Depressed 72 (69.2) 743 (74.3)
Mixed 24 (23.1) 98 (9.8)
Depth of invasion < 0.0001
Mucosa 24 (23.1) 601 (60.1)
Submucosa 80 (77.0) 399 (39.9)
Sm1 11 (10.6) 139 (13.9)
Sm2 34 (32.7) 123 (12.3)
Sm3 35 (33.7) 137 (13.7)
Ulceration 0.222
Absent 86 (9.0) 872 (91.0)
Present 18 (12.1) 128 (85.9)
Lymphovascular invasion < 0.0001
Absent 44 (42.3) 911 (91.1)
Present 60 (57.7) 89 (8.9)
Histological type < 0.0001
Well differentiated 4 (3.8) 232 (23.2)
Moderate differentiated 45 (43.3) 352 (35.2)
Poorly differentiated 36 (34.6) 208 (20.8)
Signet ring cell 19 (18.3) 208 (20.8)

Sm1: Upper third; Sm2: Middle third; Sm3: Lower third.