Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 13;56(1):284–290. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14459

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Top: The averaged normalized 2f FFT for each of the two subject groups for eccentricities between 0.5 and 3.0° demonstrating a smaller normalized 2f FFT for the AMD group at each eccentricity. Bottom: The averaged RMS error from 2f curve fitting for each of the two subject groups for each eccentricity between 0.5 and 3.0° demonstrating higher RMS at each eccentricity resulting from poorer curve fitting in the AMD group.