Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2015 Jan 6;21:69–75. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893159

The Effects of Oxytocin on Cognitive Defect Caused by Chronic Restraint Stress Applied to Adolescent Rats and on Hippocampal VEGF and BDNF Levels

Ayfer Dayi 1,A,B,C,D,E,F,, Ferihan Cetin 1,B, Ali Riza Sisman 2,B,C, Ilkay Aksu 1,B, Aysegul Tas 1,B, Sevil Gönenc 1,D, Nazan Uysal 1,A,B,C,D,E,F
PMCID: PMC4294596  PMID: 25559382

Abstract

Background

Because brain development continues during adolescence, the effects of chronic stress on hippocampal changes that occur during that period are permanent. Oxytocin, which is synthesized in the hypothalamus and has many receptors in brain regions, including the hippocampus, may affect learning-memory. This study aimed to investigate chronic restraint stress on hippocampal functions, and hippocampal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in adolescent male and female rats and the role of oxytocin in these effects.

Material/Methods

Experimental groups included control, stress+oxytocin, and stress+saline groups. Restraint stress was applied to all the stress groups for 1 h/day, for 7 days. Learning-memory tests were performed after the 7th day.

Results

In the stress+oxytocin groups, the process of finding the platform was shorter than in others groups. The stress+saline groups spent less time, whereas the stress+oxytocin groups spent more time, on the target quadrant in the probe trial. In the stress+oxytocin groups thigmotaxis time (indicating anxiety) decreased, but VEGF and BDNF levels increased. A positive correlation was found between VEGF and BDNF levels and the time spent within the target quadrant.

Conclusions

The results indicate that impaired hippocampal learning and memory loss due to chronic restraint stress can be positively affected by intranasal oxytocin.

MeSH Keywords: Adolescent; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Learning; Oxytocin; Stress, Psychological; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Background

Stress is a well known environmental factor that can affect human and animals, resulting in behavioral changes and causing various diseases. In addition, stress is acknowledged as a critical regulator in brain functions and cognition. The hippocampus, which is very susceptible to stress, is the one of the most important regions in the brain, and is responsible for learning and memory [1]. Therefore, when responding to stress, the hippocampus has a significant function in the negative feedback regulation of glucocorticoid release from the HPA axis [2]. Glucocorticoids affect cognitive functions through neural plasticity, and the receptors in the hippocampus mediate these tasks in that region. As a consequence, the structure and function of the hippocampus are easily impacted by chronic stress factors [3]. Studies indicate that prolonged and/or recurrent stress can negatively influence learning and memory in adults [4]. On the other hand, such effects are temporary and can regress when stress is eliminated [5]. The effects of chronic stress in the adolescent period are permanent because brain development and maturation of the HPA have not yet been completed [6].

The adolescent period in rats begins between the 28th and 42nd days after birth and continues until the 60th day [7]. The rodent hippocampus develops and its volume increases throughout the period of adolescence [8]. Compared to adults, the hippocampal cell proliferation rate is higher in adolescents and dendritic intensity is at maximum in puberty [9]. Simultaneously, compared to the other ages, daily vital stresses are perceived as higher and cause developmental changes by activating various neural systems [10].

In mammalians, oxytocin is important in neuromodulation and neurotransmission in the central nervous system (CNS) [11]. Paraventricular oxytocinergic neurons provide projections to various brain regions like the hippocampus and the amygdale [12]. In humans, it was shown that oxytocin can influence behavior by affecting the CNS and it is released by social interaction, touching, and coitus [13]. In laboratory animals, it was shown that oxytocin, which normally cannot pass through the blood-brain barrier, can pass through it when applied intranasally [11,13]. In addition, oxytocin injections decreased stress response and anxiety [14]. Studies have shown that oxytocin plays a critical role in both learning and memory [15]. Nevertheless, the effect of oxytocin on impaired memory functions related to chronic stress is not yet known.

Angiotrophic and neurotrophic factors (NTF) play a critical role in neuronal lifecycle, differentiation, and synaptic plasticity. There is a relationship between neurotrophic and angiogenic factors based on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which has been suggested as a model for adult neurogenesis [16]. BDNF has been proposed as a trophic factor that can alleviate damage to the hippocampus induced by stress [17]. It has been found that BDNF injections in the dentate gyrus and CA3 areas can improve performance on behavioral tests [18]. Studies incorporating single or repeated stress treatments have reported results of decreased BDNF mRNA throughout the hippocampal region [19]. In addition, VEGF has direct neurotrophic and neuroprotective consequences [16]. VEGF receptors are found on endothelial and nonvascular cells, including neurons, where it is believed they are responsible for the regulation of neural development [20]. It is apparent that stress affects both VEGF and BDNF levels in the adult hippocampus. The levels of both of these factors are decreased by chronic stress but the way in which this transpires is unknown [21]. However, in adolescents the impacts of stress on hippocampal VEGF and BDNF levels are unknown. This study aimed to investigate chronic restraint stress on hippocampal functions, and hippocampal VEGF and BDNF levels in adolescent male and female rats and the role of oxytocin in these effects.

Material and Methods

Subjects

Forty-two 31-day-old Wistar Albino rats were used in the study (the adolescent period is postnatal days (PND) 28–42). Between 09:00 and 11:00 am, experiments were conducted in a sound-attenuated and air-regulated experimental room. Standard colony conditions of a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 07:00 am), constant room temperature (22±1°C), and humidity (60%) were maintained. Food and water were available constantly. The experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the Experimental Animal Laboratory, and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine.

Experimental groups

The experimental animals were divided into 6 groups: Group 1: control males, Group 2: control females, Group 3: stress+oxytocin males, Group 4: stress+oxytocin females, Group 5: stress+saline males, Group 6: stress+saline females (for each group n=7; 42 rats in total). The experimental groups (stress+oxytocin and stress+saline) were subjected to chronic restraint stress (1 h per day, 7 consecutive days). The control groups were not subjected to stress.

Restraint stress protocol

The rats’ trunks were wrapped with a restrictive harness and they were placed on a wooden plate for a period of 60 min. The animals could move only their head and limbs but not their trunk. This method of restraint stress has been used in other studies of physical and psychogenic stress models in rodents [22]. Following the completion of the restraint stress, a 100-μl pipette was used to administer intranasal 2 μg/kg oxytocin or saline [23]. The oxytocin (for the stress+oxytocin groups) or saline (for the stress+saline groups) was administered to both the left and right rhinarium equally and gradually by insertion of the tip of the pipette. The rats were returned to their home cage upon completion of the application. At least 2 days prior to the experiment, rats were held for a 2-min period to reduce non-specific stress responses that might occur during the administration procedure. Upon completion of the 7-day stress period, all rats were subjected to learning and memory tests for evaluation of hippocampal function.

Learning and memory test

The Morris water maze (MWM) was used to evaluate learning and memory. A round black Plexiglas pool with a diameter of 140 cm and a height of 75 cm was filled with warm water (22±1°C). A platform with an 11-cm diameter was placed 1.5 cm below the water surface in the pool. All groups received 5 daily trials for 4 days with the intention to train the rats concerning the position of the platform. On each of the 4 days, a different initiation point (north, south, east, west) was chosen and the same point was used for the whole day. The location of the platform was not changed for the duration of the experiment. It was expected that the rats find the platform within 60 s of being placed in the water and they were allowed to remain on the platform for a period of 20 s. The time it took for the rats to reach the platform, the swimming speeds, and the distances they covered within the 4-day learning process were calculated and then evaluated. On the fifth and final day, the platform was removed and a probe trial was conducted. Then the duration the rats spent on the target quadrant, which had previously been hidden by the platform, and on the opposite quadrant, were calculated for 60 s. The results of the rats swimming around the pool wall at a distance of 15 cm in the probe trial was indicative of anxiety and therefore evaluated as thigmotaxis. An HVS image video tracking system (Buckingham, UK) was used to record and analyze the results of the learning tests.

Biochemical analysis

Following the MWM test, the rats were sacrificed using light ether anesthesia, blood was drawn, and the brains were removed. Commercially available ELISA kits specific for rat (BDNF Catalog Number EK0308, Boster Immunoleader, Wuhan, China with assay sensitivity <2 pg/ml and range 31.2–2000 pg/ml) were used to determine the BDNF and VEGF levels. In compliance with the manufacturer’s instructions, the hippocampus homogenates were measured using VEGF catalog no. EK0308, Boster Immunoleader, Wuhan, China, with assay sensitivity <1 pg/ml and range 15.6–1000 pg/ml).

Statistical analysis

SPSS 15.0 was used to complete the statistical analysis and the differences in the behavioral and biochemical parameters were evaluated according to the ANOVA post hoc Sheefe comparisons. The GLM repeated measure was used to determine the differences between the learning periods in the MWM. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted and a correlation between the MWM test results and BDNF, VEGF, and ELISA results was obtained. The results are presented as mean ±S.E.M. (the significance level was set at p≤0.05).

Results

This study results clearly indicate that chronic restraint stress has adverse impacts on the learning process in both genders. The findings show that in the MWM learning test, oxytocin inhibited the process of finding the platform; the duration was prolonged as a result of stress (p<0.05 in males and females) (Figure 1A, 1B). In the probe trial (MWM memory test), the groups subjected to stress+saline spent less time in the target quadrant (p<0.002 for both sexes) and spent more time in the opposite quadrant (p<0.05 for both sexes). However, that time was prolonged with intranasal oxytocin (p<0.001 for both sexes) (Figure 2A, 2B). In addition, in the oxytocin-administered groups, thigmotaxis time was shorter (p<0.001 for both sexes) (Figure 3), whereas, compared to the other groups, VEGF and BDNF levels were higher (VEGF, p<0.001, BDNF, p<0.05 in females; VEGF, p<0.002, BDNF, p<0.05 in males) (Figures 4 and 5). Furthermore, a positive correlation was found between VEGF and BDNF levels and the time on the platform (r=0.533, p=0.002 with VEGF; r=0.434, p=0.017 with BDNF).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effects of restraint stress on Morris Water Maze performance. Mean daily latencies to escape from the start point onto the hidden platform (A) in the male and (B) female rats. * p<0.05 compared to the other groups.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Time spent in the target and opposite quadrant in probe trial. (A) in the male and (B) female rats. * p<0.002 compared with control groups. ** p<0.001 compared to the stress+saline groups.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Thigmotaxis time in probe trial in the male and female rats. * p<0.001 compared to the other groups.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Hippocampal VEGF results. * p<0.002, ** p<0.001 compared to the other groups.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Hippocampal BDNF results. * p<0.05 compared to the other groups.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that during the MWM learning tests of both female and male rats, the time required to find the hidden platform gradually shortened and reached a stable level. No significant difference between males and females was observed in any of the groups. However, the learning tests of stress+oxytocin and control groups showed that these groups were more successful than the stress+saline groups (Figure 1A, 1B). The probe trial showed that the stress+oxytocin and control groups spent more time within the target quadrant than in the other quadrant, compared to the stress+saline groups (Figure 2A, 2B). Previous studies have shown that stress affects the hippocampus morphology and that increased corticosterone levels suppress cell proliferation and neurogenesis [24]. In rodents stress can cause cell loss in the CA1 and CA3 hippocampal areas [25]. In addition, repeated restraint stress can cause atrophy in the apical dendrites of CA3 pyramidal neurons [26]. Neurons in the hippocampal CA1 and CA3 areas are critically important in establishing the correct route during the learning period and then enabling the subjects to find the hidden platform in the MWM learning test. CA1 neurons in the hippocampus are active in the acquisition of spatial learning and memory [27]. One other undisputed fact is the contribution to long-term potentiation (LTP), which occurs in the CA1 subfield in the hippocampus [28]. The CA1 neurons carry information from the entorhinal cortex or the CA3 subfield, thus enabling learning [29]. The CA3 is connected to the CA1 subfield through the Schaffer collaterals cycle, and the CA1 outputs extend to the subiculum, entorhinal cortex, and prefrontal cortex [30]. Rats with lesions in the hippocampus CA3 subfield, but with a healthy CA1 subfield, could succeed in the learning process in the MWM test. However, in the probe trials, where information needs to be reclaimed, they swam around aimlessly [27]. Therefore, it is clear that having a healthy CA3 and a CA1–CA3 connection is necessary for the function of reference memory. However, the exact involvement of oxytocin in these areas is still very controversial [31]. A significant amount of evidence exists indicating the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in social interaction [13]. Nevertheless, the influence of oxytocin on the non-social aspects of learning and memory has not been studied sufficiently. A study has shown that during a radial maze task, repeated injections of oxytocin significantly improved long-term memory in virgin female mice. It was suggested that oxytocin injections enhanced consolidation, which is a fundamental trait of hippocampal function [32]. However, within the same experimental setting, oxytocin did not impair short-term memory [15]. A study conducted by Leuner et al. demonstrated that oxytocin increased cell proliferation and neuronal growth in the rats exposed to stress, and protected hippocampal plasticity against the stress hormones [33]. Another study concluded that oxytocin stimulated cell proliferation and neurogenesis by decreasing corticosterone levels [34]. Unfortunately, not enough data is available concerning the effects of oxytocin during the acquisition of learning and in memory tasks.

During the MWM testing in rodents, thigmotaxis was considered to be reliable indicator of anxiety-like behavior. Anxiolytic agents are known to reduce the total duration of thigmotaxis [35]. Conversely, anxiogenic stimuli, such as the systemic administration of corticosteroids, increase thigmotaxis [36]. In our study, the stress+oxytocin groups were more successful than the stress+saline groups in the learning and memory tests. In addition, having a significantly lower thigmotaxis time indicates the decreased anxiety levels in adolescent rats that received oxytocin after being subjected to stress (Figure 3).

NTF are significant factors mediating the growth, development, and plasticity of the brain. Altering NTF levels can impact the brain’s normal development and maturation and may cause long-term changes in brain functions and activity. VEGF is an NTF and especially protects hippocampal CA1 cells [37]. Since BDNF is a NTF involved in critical CNS function along with synaptic transmission and plasticity, it has a fundamental role in the survival, maintenance, and growth of neurons [38]. BDNF is known to be widely distributed in the brain, and is synthesized mainly in neurons. The hippocampus and cerebral cortex are responsible for the highest expression [39]. Similarly, BDNF has a crucial function in maintenance of neuron vitality in the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as the formation of new neurons and synapses [40] and the formation of long-term memory [41]. NTF, such as BDNF and VEGF, are effective in hippocampal learning and are affected by stress. Chronic stress impacts NTF as BDNF and VEGF in the adult hippocampus and influences the process of learning and memory [21]. It was determined that chronic stress and corticosterone administration decreased BDNF levels in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and CA3 regions. Likewise, BDNF injections to these regions have resulted in improvements in learning and memory tests [18]. Also, it was shown that one-time or recurrent physical restraint stress decreased the hippocampal BDNF-mRNA levels [19]. In our study, the BDNF and VEGF levels in adolescent rats were evaluated in the hippocampus, which is the brain region responsible for spatial learning and memory. In the group administered oxytocin immediately after restraint stress, BDNF and VEGF levels were significantly higher (Figures 4 and 5) and there was a positive correlation between the hippocampal VEGF and BDNF levels and the time spent in the target quadrant.

Conclusions

It is not clear how oxytocin affects neurotrophic factors such as VEGF and BDNF. Oxytocin has been shown to play a critical role in the acquisition of learning and memory in animal studies. Despite its role in learning and memory indicated in these studies, there is still much to learn about how oxytocin functions at cellular and molecular levels.

When compared to adults, stress in adolescents affects the neural system far more extensively because hippocampal development continues during adolescence. As a result, the female and male adolescent rats exposed to chronic stress experienced inhibitions in hippocampal learning and memory. Furthermore, the hippocampal VEGF and BDNF levels increased and anxiety levels decreased upon the administration of intranasal oxytocin. Our data suggest that in adolescent rats, intranasal oxytocin may positively affect the impaired hippocampal learning and memory resulting from chronic restraint stress. Further studies are required to support and expand this conclusion.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there have been no conflicts of interest.

Source of support: Departmental sources

Statement

No specific grants were used from any funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

References

  • 1.Aggleton JP, Vann SD, Oswald CJ, et al. Identifying cortical inputs to the rat hippocampus that subserve allocentric spatial processes: a simple problem with a complex answer. Hippocampus. 2000;10:466–74. doi: 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<466::AID-HIPO13>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacobson L, Sapolsky R. The role of the hippocampus in feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Endocr Rev. 1991;12:118–34. doi: 10.1210/edrv-12-2-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Conrad CD. Chronic stress-induced hippocampal vulnerability: the glucocorticoid vulnerability hypothesis. Rev Neurosci. 2008;19:395–411. doi: 10.1515/revneuro.2008.19.6.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tomar A, Polygalov D, Chattarji S, McHugh TJ. The dynamic impact of repeated stress on the hippocampal spatial map. Hippocampus. 2014 doi: 10.1002/hipo.22348. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sousa N, Lukoyanov NV, Madeira MD, et al. Reorganization of the morphology of hippocampal neurites and synapses after stress-induced damage correlates with behavioral improvement. Neuroscience. 2000;97:253–66. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mccormick CM, Mathews IZ, Thomas C, et al. Investigations of HPA function and the enduring consequences of stressors in adolescence in animal models. Brain Cogn. 2010;72:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Spear LP, Brake SC. Periadolescence: age-dependent behavior and psychopharmacological responsivity in rats. Dev Psychobiol. 1983;16:83–109. doi: 10.1002/dev.420160203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koshibu K, Levitt P, Ahrens ET. Sex-specific, postpuberty changes in mouse brain structures revealed by three-dimensional magnetic resonance microscopy. Neuroimage. 2004;22:1636–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.He J, Crews FT. Neurogenesis decreases during brain maturation from adolescence to adulthood. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86:327–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mccormick CM, Mathews IZ. Adolescent development, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal function, and programming of adult learning and memory. Prog Neuro-Psychophar Biol Psychiat. 2010;34:756–65. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gordon I, Zagoory-Sharon O, Schneiderman I, et al. Oxytocin and cortisol in romantically unattached young adults: associations with bonding and psychological distress. Psychophysiology. 2008;45:349–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bale TL, Davis AM, Auger AP, et al. CNS region-specific oxytocin receptor expression: importance in regulation of anxiety and sex behavior. J Neurosci. 2001;21:2546–52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-07-02546.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guastella A, Mitchell P, Mathews F. Oxytocin enhances the encoding of positive social memories in humans. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:256–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Figueira R, Peabody M, Lonstein J. Oxytocin receptor activity in the ventrocaudal periaqueductal gray modulates anxiety-related behavior in postpartum rats. Behav Neurosci. 2008;122:618–28. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.122.3.618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tomizawa K, Iga N, Lu YF, et al. Oxytocin improves long-lasting spatial memory during motherhood through MAP kinase cascade. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:384–90. doi: 10.1038/nn1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Newton SS, Duman RS. Regulation of neurogenesis and angiogenesis in depression. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2004;1:261–67. doi: 10.2174/1567202043362388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ortiz JB, Mathewson CM, Hoffman AN, et al. Hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor mediates recovery from chronic stress-induced spatial reference memory deficits. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;40:3351–62. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shirayama Y, Chen AC, Nakagawa S, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor produces antidepressant effects in behavioral models of depression. J Neurosci. 2002;22:3251–61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03251.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fuchikami M, Morinobu S, Kurata A, et al. Single immobilization stress differentially alters the expression profile of transcripts of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene and histone acetylation at its promoters in the rat hippocampus. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;12:73–82. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708008997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yourey PA, Gohari S, Su JL, et al. Vascular endothelial cell growth factors promote the in vitro development of rat photoreceptor cells. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6781–88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-18-06781.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shi SS, Shao SH, Yuan BP, et al. Acute stress and chronic stress change brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine kinase-coupled receptor (TrkB) expression in both young and aged rat hippocampus. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51:661–71. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.5.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lenz HJ, Raedler A, Greten, et al. Stress-induced gastrointestinal secretory and motor responses in rats are mediated by endogenous corticotropin-releasing factor. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1510–17. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(88)80070-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Neumann ID, Maloumby R, Beiderbeck DI, et al. Increased brain and plasma oxytocin after nasal and peripheral administration in rats and mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:1985–93. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brummelte S, Galea LA. Chronic high corticosterone reduces neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult male and female rats. Neuroscience. 2010;168:680–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Passecker J, Hok V, Della-Chiesa A, et al. Dissociation of dorsal hippocampal regional activation under the influence of stress in freely behaving rats. Front Behav Neurosci. 2011;5:66. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Watanabe Y, Gould E, Mcewen BS. Stress induces atrophy of apical dendrites of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons. Brain Res. 1992;588:341–45. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91597-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brun VH, Otnæss MK, Molden S, et al. Place cells and place recognition maintained by direct entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry. Science. 2002;296:2243–46. doi: 10.1126/science.1071089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bliss TVP, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361:31–39. doi: 10.1038/361031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O’keefe J, Nadel L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Clarendon; Oxford, UK: 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Amaral DG, Witter MP. The Hippocampal Formation: The Rat Nervous System. Academic Press; San Diego, Calif, USA: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Engelmann M, Wotjak CT, Neumann I, et al. Behavioral consequences of intracerebral vasopressin and oxytocin: Focus on learning and memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20:341–58. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mcewen BB. Closing remarks: review and commentary on selected aspects of the roles of vasopressin and oxytocin in memory processing. Adv Pharmacol. 2004;50:655–708. doi: 10.1016/S1054-3589(04)50015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leuner B, Caponiti JM, Gould E. Oxytocin stimulates adult neurogenesis even under conditions of stress and elevated glucocorticoids. Hippocampus. 2012;22:861–68. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cohen H, Kaplan Z, Kozlovsky N, et al. Hippocampal microinfusion of oxytocin attenuates the behavioural response to stress by means of dynamic interplay with the glucocorticoid-catecholamine responses. J Neuroendocrinol. 2010;22:889–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Simon P, Dupuis R, Costentin J. Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behav Brain Res. 1994;61:59–64. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Herrero AI, Sandi C, Venero C. Individual differences in anxiety trait are related to spatial learning abilities and hippocampal expression of mineralocorticoid receptors. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2006;86:150–59. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nicoletti JN, Shah SK, Mccloskey DP, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is up-regulated after status epilepticus and protects against seizure-induced neuronal loss in hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2008;151:232–41. doi: 10.1061/j.neuroscience.2007.09.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stranahan AM. Physiological variability in brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression predicts dendritic spine density in the mouse dentate gyrus. Neurosci Lett. 2011;495:60–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ernfors P, Wetmore C, Olson L, et al. Identification of cells in rat brain and peripheral tissues expressing mRNA for members of the nerve growth factor family. Neuron. 1990;5:511–26. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90090-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Acheson A, Conover JC, Fandl JP, et al. BDNF autocrine loop in adult sensory neurons prevents cell death. Nature. 1995;374:450–53. doi: 10.1038/374450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bekinschtein P, Cammarota M, Katche C, et al. BDNF is essential to promote persistence of long-term memory storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2711–16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711863105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES