Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 15;26(2):283–293. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-05-0281

TABLE 1:

Comparison of properties of SpPRF, WT ScPFY, and ScPFY(9-Mut).

Profilin Protein stabilitya (D1/2, M urea) Poly-l-proline bindingb (Kd, μM) Cdc12(FH1) bindingc (Kd, μM) Muscle G-actin bindingd (Kd, μM) Fission yeast G-actin bindinge (actin band intensity at 5 μM profilin, a.u.) Nucleotide exchangef (time to one-half exchange at 0.5 μM profilin, s) PtdIns(4,5)P2 bindingg (percentage unbound profilin in flowthrough, 100 μM PtdIns(4,5)P2)
SpPRF 4.5 59 6.4 0.8 6.4 59.3 ± 6.7 34.1 ± 1.6
ScPFY 3.3 224 24.7 0.7 10.1 29.0 ± 3.9 57.4 ± 2.8
ScPFY (9-Mut) 2.6 195 22.7 0.4 9.4 16.3 ± 3.9 18.0 ± 2.9

aSupplemental Figure S3A.

bSupplemental Figure S4A.

cSupplemental Figure S4B.

dSupplemental Figure S3, B and C.

eSupplemental Figure S3, D and E.

fSupplemental Figure S3, F and G.

gSupplemental Figure S4C.