Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 11;5(1):67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.11.007

Table 2.

Experimental results and failure characteristics of all specimens after complete collapse.

Group# Specimen fcu (MP)a Cracking load (kN)
Pu (kN) Deflection (mm) Toughness (N mm) Ultimate strain at failure, micro-strain
Dominant mode of failure
Beam Column Joint MS Beam MS Column Stirrup Column2 FRP 1 FRP 2
Control J0 25.4 10 25 45 79.8 40.2 2655 2350 1479 1310 Flexural failure of the beam



Group #1 JI0 24.8 10 25 40 67 29.6 1733 1600 1428 Shear failure at the joint
JI1 25.1 10 103.8 19.3 1276 2780 1462 12,500 11,900 Rupture of the CFRP sheet
JI2 25.8 58 107.8 26.9 2163 2900 1740 13,000 Rupture of the CFRP sheet



Group #2 JII0 25.9 10 32 50 70 20.4 971 1720 1413 1000 De-bonding of main reinforcement
JII1 26.1 48 38 63 85 13.1 726 3301 1173 1110 8000 Peeling off at the end of the CFRP sheets
JII2 25.4 35 65 89.7 14.8 953 3542 1633 1190 8950 Rupture of the CFRP sheet



Group #3 JIII0 25.3 10 40 50 65.1 15.2 629 1610 1220 850 1010 Splitting flexural failure at the upper implanted column
JIII1 26.1 10 45 65 85.1 26.8 1762 3102 1091 1075 1450 10,500 Peeling off at the end of CFRP plates
JIII2 26.5 10 25 40 73.7 13.3 621 1750 1273 1010 1300 8020 Peeling off at the end of CFRP sheets
JIII3 25.8 10 42 66.2 20.4 989 1690 1260 890 1080 2000 De-bonding of CFRP sheet followed by rupture of CFRP anchorage sheet

MS Beam: strain on the main steel of the beam, MS Column: strain on the tension main steel of the lower column, Column2: strain on tension main steel for the implanted upper column, FRP1: strain on the longitudinal direction of the strengthening CFRP, FRP2: strain on the horizontal CFRP sheet at the joint.