Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Oct 9;24(1):3–14. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0568

Table 2.

Similarities in cancer screening constructs across the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), 2005

Construct NHIS HINTS BRFSS CHIS Wording same? Response options same? Universe same?
Clinical Breast Exam (CBE)
CBE ever had a No Yes No
CBE most recent a No No No
CBE past 12 months
Mammography (Mam)
Mam ever had a Yes Yes No. NHIS and CHIS the same
Mam most recent a No. All similar; may be possible to merge No. BRFSS and CHIS similar; NHIS could be coded to be similar to others No. NHIS and CHIS the same
Mam frequency Same question, CHIS has extra language Yes. Yes.
Mam age at first
Mam main reason did not have Yes. Yes No.
Mam main reason did have No No No
Mam abnormal No Yes Yes
Mam abnormal: cancer
Mam abnormal: follow-up test or surgery
Mam abnormal: follow-up type
Mam provider recommendation (if screening off schedule) No No Yes
Mam provider recommendation (if screening on schedule) No No Yes
Pap Test (Pap)
Pap ever had a No Yes Yes, if NHIS and CHIS skip cervical cancer survivors
Pap most recent a No. NHIS and HINTS very similar No. CHIS and BRFSS similar; NHIS could be coded to be similar to others No
Pap frequency No, but similar Yes Yes
Pap penultimate
Pap main reason did not have No, but similar Yes No
Pap main reason did have No, but similar No, but similar Yes, if NHIS skips cervical cancer survivors
Pap abnormal
Pap abnormal: follow-up test
Pap abnormal: follow-up surgery
Pap provider recommendation (if screening off schedule) No, but similar Yes No
Pap provider recommendation (if screening on schedule)
Pap intention
Pap guideline knowledge ✓ (2 items)
Pap willingness to extend interval
Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT)
Home FOBT ever had b No Yes No; CHIS and NHIS the same
Home FOBT most recent b No No. CHIS and BRFSS similar; NHIS could be coded to be similar to others No; CHIS and NHIS the same
Home FOBT frequency
Home FOBT main reason did not have Yes Yes No
Home FOBT main reason did have
Home FOBT abnormal
Home FOBT abnormal: timing
Home FOBT abnormal: follow-up type
Home FOBT provider recommendation (if screening off schedule) No Yes Yes
Home FOBT provider recommendation (if screening on schedule)
Office FOBT ever had
Office FOBT most recent
Endoscopy (Endo)
Endo ever had b No Yes No. CHIS and NHIS the same
Endo most recent b No No, may be possible to merge No. CHIS and NHIS the same
Endo frequency
Endo type No No No
Endo main reason did not have No Yes No
Endo main reason did have
Endo provider recommendation (if screening off schedule) No Yes No
Endo provider recommendation (if screening on schedule)
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
CRC screening fear
CRC screening benefit
CRC risk reduction
CRC screening test knowledge
CRC screening provider recommendation
Prostate-Specific Antigen Test (PSA)
PSA ever heard Same question, CHIS has extra language Yes No
PSA ever had c Yes No; CHIS, BRFSS, and NHIS the same No; CHIS, BRFSS, and NHIS the same
PSA most recent c No; NHIS and HINTS the same No. CHIS and BRFSS similar; NHIS could be coded to be similar to others No; CHIS, BRFSS, and NHIS the same
PSA frequency
PSA age at first
PSA main reason did have
PSA provider discussion
PSA provider recommendation (for or against)
PSA provider encourage questions
Digital Rectal Exam (DRE)
DRE ever had c
DRE most recent c

Notes: Gray columns indicate constructs that were only assessed by a single survey. For complete information about the items used to assess each construct, organized by survey, please refer to Supplemental Table 1.

a

Construct only assessed in 11 states (Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wyoming)

b

Construct only assessed in 7 states (Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Virginia)

c

Construct assessed by 0 states (i.e., item proposed but not adopted for use in any state surveys)