Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.Victimiz ation a (W1) |
-- | .44*** | .34*** | .20*** | .21** | .15** | .28*** | .20*** | .19*** | .02 | .09 | .09 | .10 | .02 |
2. Witnessing a (W1) |
-- | .29** | .25*** | .30*** | .22*** | .40*** | .30*** | .34*** | .07 | −.08 | .13* | .06 | .27*** | |
3.Social constraints (W1) |
-- | .27*** | .26*** | .27*** | .16** | .12* | .12* | .03 | .04 | −.02 | .07 | .13* | ||
4.Social constraints (W2) |
-- | .32*** | .33** | .24*** | .20*** | .09 | .01 | −.02 | .01 | .03 | .09 | |||
5.Intrusive thoughts (W2) | -- | .51*** | .20*** | .27*** | .10 | −.04 | −.11* | .05 | .03 | .01 | ||||
6.Intrusvie thoughts( W3) |
-- | .19*** | .22*** | .06 | −.12 | −.07 | .01 | .02 | .03 | |||||
7.Sleep problems (Composit e W1-W3) |
-- | .64*** | .24*** | .10* | −.21*** | .09 | .12* | −.06 | ||||||
8.Sleep problems (W4) |
-- | .18*** | .10 | −.24*** | .07 | .07 | −.08 | |||||||
9.Life events (W1) |
-- | .18*** | −.10 | .06 | .05 | .14** | ||||||||
10.Age | -- | .03 | .03 | .06 | −.03 | |||||||||
11.Sex | -- | −.01 | .03 | .04 | ||||||||||
12. Family Structure |
-- | .03 | .01 | |||||||||||
13.Conditi on |
-- | .02 | ||||||||||||
14.School | --- | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
M | 8.79 | 12.9 9 |
7.20 | 7.44 | 3.63 | 2.75 | 21.4 5 |
20.8 5 |
3.56 | 12.4 5 |
48.9 % |
37.6 % |
50% | 78.7 % |
SD | 1.24 | 1.60 | 3.26 | 3.36 | 4.84 | 4.33 | 6.32 | 7.28 | 1.90 | 0.59 |
Note. W1 = Wave 1, fall of 7th grade; W2 = Wave 2, spring of 7th grade; Wave 4 = Wave 4, spring of 8th grade. Family structure was coded 0 = two-parent home, 1 = single-parent home. Sex was coded 0 = female, 1 = male. Condition was coded 0 = control, 1 = experimental. School was coded 0 = Richmond, 1 = Philadelphia.
Log transformed. Ns range from 277 to 362 due to missing data.
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001.