Table 2.
Methodological quality of studies included in the meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to ACDF for treating one-level CDDD
Years | Baseline | Randomization | Allocation concealment | Blinding | Quality level | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size | Age | Sex | |||||
Porchet [7] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Unclear | B |
Murrey [8] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Unclear | B |
Nabhan [9] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Unclear | B |
Garrido [10] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Unclear | B |
Burkus [11] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Unclear | B |
Sasso [12] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Double | B |
Coric [13] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Inadequate | Unclear | Single | B |
Jawahar [14] | Comparable | Comparable | Comparable | Adequate | Unclear | Double | B |
Comparable: the variables were comparable among all studies
Each domain of quality assessment was classified as: adequate (A), unclear (B), or inadequate (C)