Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 7;57:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1441-0

Table 4.

Comparison of IST-3 angiography scores from 15 scans as assessed by seven members of the IST-3 expert panel

Scan Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 3 Reader 4 Reader 5 Reader 6 Reader 7
1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 2b 0 1 2a 0 0 0
4 2b 0 0 2b 0 0 0
5 2a 0 0 2b 0 2a 2b
6 3 2b 1 3 4 3 4
7 1 1 0 2b 0 0 1
8 3 4 4 3 4 3 4
9 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
10 2a 1 4 2b 0 3 1
11 2b 0 1 2b 0 0 0
12 1 4 3 3 1 0 4
13 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
14 2b 1 2b 2b 0 0 2a
15 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

K-alpha for this inter-observer analysis (315 pairs of readings) is 0.60 (95 % CI = 0.53–0.66). 0 = No patency, 1 = contrast penetrates obstruction but minimal enters the distal artery, 2a = luminal patency of <50 % with partial filling (<half) of major branches, 2b = luminal patency of <50 % with partial filling (>half) of major branches, 3 = patency of >50 % of lumen and filling of most branches and 4 = complete patency