Table 1.
Ref. | Coppola et al[43] (2014) | Zeng et al[42] (2014) | Cheng et al[41] (2010) | Zhao et al[40] (2009) | De Palma et al[36] (2001) | Mukherjee et al[37] (2000) | De Palma et al[35] (1998) |
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness | |||||||
Patients, n | 7 | 59 | 90 | 75 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
SEMS diameter, mm | 30 | 20/25 | 20/25/30 | 30 | 18 | 18/20 | 18 |
Time to removal, d | 6 | 30 | 4-5 | 3-7 | ? | ? | ? |
Technical success, % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Initial remission, % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Major complications | |||||||
Stent migration, n | 0 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
Perforation, n | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Bleeding, n | 0 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
30-d mortality, n | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |