Table 1.
Results of the e-tool evaluation among NHL patients and laymen (closed questions).
| Question |
|
Positive response, n (%) | |
|
|
|
Patients (n=6) | Laymen (n=6) |
| Layout |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the text clear? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Are you satisfied with letter type and size? | 3 (50) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Are you satisfied with the writing style? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Is the use of colors attractive to you? | 4 (67) | 5 (83) |
|
|
Are there enough illustrations and short videos to support the text? | 5 (83) | 5 (83) |
|
|
Are the illustrations and short videos clear? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
| User convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the e-tool easy to use? | 4 (67) | 5 (83) |
|
|
Is the format of the e-tool easy to understand? | 5 (83) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Are you satisfied with the speed of the e-tool? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
| Menu clarity |
|
|
|
|
|
Does the composition of the menu seem natural? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Are you satisfied with the navigation through the e-tool? | 5 (83) | 5 (83) |
|
|
Is it easy to find the information you are looking for? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
| Information clarity |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the information provided on the e-tool understandable? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Does the e-tool make use of too much medical terminology?a | 4 (67) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Do you understand what NHL is, after reading the information provided on the e-tool? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Do you understand what treatment options are available, after reading the e-tool? | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
| General impression |
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any flaws/errors in this e-tool?a | 5 (83) | 5 (83) |
|
|
Would you use this e-tool if made available to you? | 5 (83) | 6 (100) |
|
|
Are there any redundant items in this e-tool?a | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
aPercentage of negative responses presented, caused by negative questioning.