Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 12;211(3):481–485. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu449

Table 1.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Cavitary Predictive Radiology Markers

Marker Training Seta
Test Setb
Region of interest PET CT PET CT
Area under the curve 90 115 90 115
Sensitivity, % 90 80 100 83.333
Specificity, % 78.182 72.727 76.923 76.923

Use of the PET ROI outperformed the CT ROI.

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; ROI, regions of interest.

a There were 10 true positive and 55 true negatives.

b There were 6 true positives and 13 true negatives.