Table 1.
Marker | Training Seta |
Test Setb |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Region of interest | PET | CT | PET | CT |
Area under the curve | 90 | 115 | 90 | 115 |
Sensitivity, % | 90 | 80 | 100 | 83.333 |
Specificity, % | 78.182 | 72.727 | 76.923 | 76.923 |
Use of the PET ROI outperformed the CT ROI.
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; ROI, regions of interest.
a There were 10 true positive and 55 true negatives.
b There were 6 true positives and 13 true negatives.