Table 3.
Placeboa n=49b/47c | CMC n=53/47 | GA n=50/49 | Psyllium n=54/46 | Overall Difference from Placebo Baseline | Additional Difference Specific to Fiber Group | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
β(seβ)d | β(seβ)e | β(seβ)e | β(seβ)e | β(seβ)e | β(seβ)f | |||
FI Consistency
|
||||||||
Baseline | 2.0 (0.15) | 0.12 (0.22) | 0.008 (0.22) | 0.25 (0.22) | ||||
Supplement Period b | 2.0 (0.15) | 0.15 (0.20) | 0.001 (0.20) | 0.21 (0.20) | −0.05 (0.14) | CMC | 0.13 (0.21) | .42 |
GA | −0.06 (0.21) | .76 | ||||||
Psyllium | −0.20 (0.24) | .52 | ||||||
Supplement Period c | 2.1 (0.09) | 0.003 (0.12) | −0.03 (0.12) | −0.08 (0.13) | −0.04 (0.07) | CMC | 0.17 (0.09) | .08 |
GA | −0.07 (0.10) | .46 | ||||||
Psyllium | −0.05 (0.11) | .63 | ||||||
|
||||||||
FI Amount
|
||||||||
Baseline | 1.6 (.07) | 0.11 (0.09) | −0.04 (0.09) | 0.19 (0.09) | ||||
Supplement Period b | 1.6 (.07) | 0.21 (0.12) | −0.03 (0.11) | 0.20 (0.12) | −0.04 (0.06) | CMC | −0.09 (0.08) | .28 |
GA | −0.08 (0.09) | .43 | ||||||
Psyllium | −0.02 (0.10) | .99 | ||||||
Supplement Period c | 1.6 (.09) | 0.18 (0.11) | −0.04 (0.11) | 0.20 (0.12) | −0.04 (0.06) | CMC | −0.10 (0.09) | .25 |
GA | −0.07 (0.09) | .40 | ||||||
Psyllium | −0.02 (0.10) | .87 |
Note. CMC = carboxymethylcellulose. GA = gum Arabic. FI = fecal incontinence. The average FI consistency for the placebo and gum arabic groups was soft but formed in both the baseline and supplement periods; for the CMC group, FI consistency was loose and unformed in both periods, and for the psyllium group, it was loose and unformed in the baseline period and soft but formed in the supplement period. There was no statistical or clinical difference in FI amount among groups.
Placebo group was reference group.
intent-to-treat analysis.
per-protocol analysis.
for intercept representing the average FI frequency/day of placebo group in the baseline period
for difference from placebo in baseline period
for additional difference specific to fiber group in supplement period