Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):59–69. doi: 10.1177/1740774510391683

Table 2.

Comparisons of total imbalance scores B by allocation strategies

Mean 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Panel (a): n = 80
Dynamic block randomization
Block size = 20 0.010 0 0.008 0.010 0.013 0.021
Block size = 10 0.038 0.005 0.028 0.038 0.049 0.097
Minimization
Pk = 2/3 0.155 0.008 0.080 0.130 0.204 0.747
Pk = 3/4 0.090 0.004 0.048 0.073 0.117 0.482
Pk = 0.8 0.067 0.004 0.035 0.056 0.084 0.380
Pk = 0.9 0.037 0.002 0.021 0.032 0.048 0.177
Pk = 1 0.024 0.003 0.015 0.021 0.031 0.084
Simple randomization 0.349 0.018 0.196 0.305 0.458 1.703
Panel (b): n = 60
Dynamic block randomization
Block size = 20 0.020 0 0.015 0.021 0.025 0.039
Block size = 10 0.065 0.004 0.048 0.064 0.081 0.153
Minimization
Pk = 2/3 0.249 0.016 0.129 0.213 0.331 1.073
Pk = 3/4 0.149 0.005 0.080 0.122 0.194 0.933
Pk = 0.8 0.119 0.004 0.062 0.098 0.153 0.539
Pk = 0.9 0.067 0.004 0.037 0.056 0.086 0.276
Pk = 1 0.044 0.003 0.026 0.040 0.055 0.275
Simple randomization 0.459 0.041 0.261 0.399 0.611 1.894
Panel (c): n = 40
Dynamic block randomization
Block size = 20 0.047 0 0.035 0.045 0.059 0.118
Block size = 10 0.140 0.010 0.104 0.136 0.174 0.657
Minimization
Pk = 2/3 0.445 0.027 0.251 0.386 0.570 2.109
Pk = 3/4 0.308 0.026 0.165 0.265 0.406 1.293
Pk = 0.8 0.245 0.023 0.132 0.205 0.317 1.427
Pk = 0.9 0.161 0 0.087 0.138 0.208 1.103
Pk = 1 0.101 0.010 0.062 0.089 0.127 0.452
Simple randomization 0.703 0.057 0.398 0.630 0.913 2.461