Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr;5(2):97–106. doi: 10.1177/1947603513515998

Table 1.

The Biomechanical Parameters (Mean, MPa), Water Content, and Relative Mobility of Major Large PG (Mean, %) of the Samples Analyzed Before and After the Freeze–Thaw Cycle.

Equilibrium modulus
Dynamic modulus
Water content
PG mobility
Group Before Mean (95% CI) After, Mean (95% CI) Before, Mean (95% CI) After, Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)
Ref 0.81 (0.71-0.91) 4.70 (3.37-6.03) 77.1 (75.9-78.4) 43.6 (41.5-45.7)
1 0.96 (0.85-1.06) 0.93 (0.83-1.04) 6.42 (4.94-7.89) 6.10 (4.79-7.41)* 77.7 (76.5-78.8) 44.6 (42.6-46.6)*
2 0.80 (0.65-0.96) 0.83 (0.68-0.97) 4.56 (3.68-5.45) 4.41 (3.56-5.26)* 78.0 (76.8-79.2) 44.7 (43.5-46.0)*
3 0.87 (0.76-0.98) 0.87 (0.77-0.97) 4.89 (3.68-6.08) 4.57 (3.55-5.59)* 77.8 (76.4-79.1) 44.4 (43.0-45.7)

PG = proteoglycan; CI = confidence interval; Ref = reference group; 1 = samples in PBS bath; 2 = samples in PBS bath containing enzyme inhibitors and antibiotics; 3 = samples in PBS with enzyme inhibitors and antibiotics, freezing in 30% DMSO; *P < 0.05, paired-sample t test (equilibrium and dynamic modulus) and independent-sample t test with Bonferroni–Holm correction (water content and PG mobility) statistical analyses were used (n = 15).