Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;3(4):323–333. doi: 10.1177/1947603512447301

Table 3.

Comparison of Impact Parameters Measured In Situ Using Internal Load Cell Versus Pressure-Sensitive Filma

Detection method Force (N) Absolute area (mm2)b Calculated load (MPa) Maximum displacement (%)c
Internal load cell 326.9 ± 47.30 1.39 ± 0.11 212.9 ± 21.2 21.50 ± 4.50
Pressurex pressure-sensitive film 439.3 ± 50.13d 1.33 ± 0.42 330.3 ± 50.3 14.23 ± 3.33e
a

All impacts generated using a blunt hemispherical tip.

b

Area determined through upper 88 % intensity (LUT function, NIH Image 1.6) of total footprint.

c

Cartilage depth determined by comparison of light micrographs of impacted and neighboring unimpacted cartilage.

d

Magnitude calculated from the footprint obtained using medium-grade Pressurex pressure-sensitive film footprint.

e

Based on average lapine articular cartilage thickness in this study, 378 ± 87 mm.