1 |
A 118-bed hospital with 150 radiation therapists and 16 radiation treatment machines (Canada) |
User interface of radiotherapy treatment delivery system |
C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Analysis of the radiotherapy treatment delivery process
30 hours of field observation of radiation therapists performing their regular tasks conducted by an HFE expert
Workflow analysis to identify tasks regularly performed by radiation therapists and areas associated with high likelihood of incidents
Heuristic evaluation by 1 radiation therapist and 2 HFE experts to identify HFE issues of the system and evaluate their severity
|
-- Redesign of the existing radiotherapy treatment delivery system
Redesign of the system based on HFE design principles
2 focus groups with experienced radiation therapists to collect feedback on the redesigned system
Refining the system based on results of focus groups
|
|
-- Comparison of the redesigned and the existing radiotherapy treatment delivery systems
|
-- Impact of redesigned system on care processes
|
-- Impact of redesigned system on employee outcomes
|
2 |
A 1200-bed academic hospital (Canada) |
CPOE order set system |
C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Analysis of existing paper admission order sets to
|
-- Design and redesign of the CPOE order set system
Configuration of the system based on the content of existing paper order sets
Heuristic evaluation by 3 HFE experts and 1 physician to identify HFE issues of the system
Iterative redesign of the system based on HFE design principles
|
|
-- Comparison of the existing paper order sets, the original CPOE order set system and the redesigned CPOE order set system
|
-- Impact of redesigned CPOE order set system on care processes
|
|
3 |
A 929-bed quaternary and tertiary referral teaching hospital, a 600-bed tertiary referral teaching hospital, a 330-bed community hospital, and a 80-bed referral center (Australia) |
Paper medical observation chart used by hospital staff to document physiological observations over time for an individual patient |
P, C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Development of usability heuristics for observation charts
Informal task analysis carried out by an HFE expert to examine how charts are filled out and used by a range of clinicians
Review and adaptation of usability heuristics from the software and web design domains
-- Analysis of existing observation charts
|
-- Design of a new observation chart
Creation of a new observation chart using the newly developed design rules
Heuristic evaluation of the newly developed observation chart to confirm that usability problems had been addressed as much as possible
|
|
-- Comparison of the redesigned observation chart and 4 existing observation charts
|
-- Impact of redesigned observation chart on care processes
|
|
4 |
A major referral center handling 140,000 outpatient visits and 14,000 surgical cases annually (Netherlands) |
OR floor marking |
P |
Environment |
-- Benchmarking with aviation
Site visits of airport conducted by a multidisciplinary team to learn experience of runway operators regarding marking, position of materials, traffic flows, safety rules and regulations, and incident management
Field observation of ORs by the multidisciplinary team to learn surgical workflow and workplace layout
|
-- Decision made by the multidisciplinary team to use floor marking to facilitate consistency in the correct positioning of surgical devices and to minimize infection risks
|
-- Implementation of floor marking in a step-by-step fashion
Temporary floor marking implemented in two of four ORs for six months
Temporary floor marking implemented in all ORs for six months
Permanent floor marking implemented in all ORs
|
-- Evaluation of system redesign
Observation to evaluate compliance with positioning of surgical devices within the clean airflow
Interviews with ophthalmic surgeons, surgical and anesthesia nurses, and managers
|
-- Impact of floor marking on care processes
|
-- Impact of floor marking on employee outcomes
|
5 |
Design and pilot testing: a 1,002-bed academic hospital Implementation and evaluation: 11 academic hospitals (6 intervention hospitals and 5 control hospitals) (Netherlands) |
Checklist for surgical pathway from admission to discharge |
C, O |
Tools and technologies |
-- Analysis of the surgical pathway and related critical safety risks
|
-- Development of a checklist prototype based on the results of analysis and HFE literature on checklist design-- Validation of the checklist
First set of observations of 41 surgical procedures by an independent researcher to identify process deviations
Creation of an observation form based on the first set of observation
Second set of observation of 130 surgical procedures to evaluate the extent of agreement between process deviations occurring in reality and items on the checklist
Revision of the checklist based on results of observation
|
-- Pilot testing of the checklist with 350 surgical procedures during a 5-month period
Instructive presentations about the checklist given to all users
Introduction of the checklist in daily practice
Structured interviews with 21 surgeons and 17 anesthesiologists at the end of the pilot test to assess usability of the checklist and to identify barriers to using the checklist
Revision of the checklist based on the results of interviews
-- Implementation of the checklist
Formation of an implementation team consisting of a surgeon, an anesthesiologist and a quality control officer in each participating hospital
Implementation of the checklist in a step-by-step fashion in the surgical wards and operating rooms
|
-- Evaluation of the impact of checklist on patient outcomes using a controlled, multi-center, prospective design
-- Retrospective analysis of the effect of the checklist on care process (timing of antibiotic prophylaxis administration) in a single hospital |
-- Impact of checklist on care processes
-- Impact of the checklist on patient outcomes
Decreased complication rate
Complication rate positively associated with rate of compliance
Decreased in-hospital mortality
|
|
6 |
Acute stroke unit of two public, tertiary hospitals (Australia) |
Booklet for providing information to stroke patients |
C |
Tools and technologies, tasks, organization |
-- Analysis of current practice in providing written information
Interviews with 57 stroke patients and 12 care providers to (1) assess the content and design characteristics of existing written materials, (2) compare the reading level of existing written materials with the reading ability of stroke patients, and (3) assess information needs of stroke patients
|
-- Identification of system design considerations
-- Design of the graphical user interface and associated database using a HFE approach
Focus groups to identify graphical user interface requirements
Interface development to incorporate all system and human functions
Usability evaluation using feedback from clinicians
Final design of the computer system
|
-- Pilot test of the computer system with 8 stroke patients and their care providers
|
-- Evaluation of the impact of the computer system
Randomized control trial to evaluate the effects of providing stroke patients with computer-generated tailored written information compared to generic written information
Randomized control trial to evaluate the effects of an education package (including computer-generated tailored written information, verbal reinforcement of information pre-discharge, and telephone contact post-discharge) on the knowledge, health, psychosocial and satisfaction outcomes of stroke patients
|
-- Impact of providing computer-generated tailored written information on patient outcomes
Higher self-efficacy for accessing stroke information
More positive of being informed
Higher satisfaction with information received
|
|
7 |
A 594-bed academic hospital (USA) |
Redesign of family history-tracking and pedigree drawing program for assessing genetic risk of hereditary cancer syndrome |
C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Analysis of the original application
Open-ended interviews with end users to determine tasks
Hierarchical task analysis conducted by reviewing interview data with end users through scenarios
Heuristic evaluation and user testing to uncover usability problems and the discrepancies between the users’ and the designers’ conceptual model
-- User analysis of the redesigned application
Survey to determine needs of potential users
Comparative analysis of three commercial products available on the market
Functional analysis of the redesigned interface
|
-- Creation of prototypes
-- Small-scale usability studies
-- Modification of prototypes based on results of usability studies |
|
-- Comparison between new and old systems using a controlled experiment
|
-- Impact of redesigned system on care processes
|
-- Impact of redesigned system on employee outcomes
|
8 |
An adult ED in a 719-bed regional referral center and level 1 trauma center (USA) |
Paper-based ED charting system |
P, C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Analysis of existing charting system
Observation to determine incidence of chart binder placement into the wrong chart rack slot and frequency of inappropriate chart binder transposition into an adjacent clinical unit
Identification of deficiencies of the existing charting system, including inconsistent and small font labeling, a single-color scheme, and absence of HFE cues
|
-- Redesign of charting system
Use of HFE principles and input from clinical providers and HFE experts to (1) improve labeling of chart binder for rapid identification of assigned patient room and clinical area, (2) enable easy distinction of a chart binder from others in proximity, and (3) highlight the misplacement of charts through design features that relied on intuitive pattern recognition -- Iterative redesign of charting system with ad hoc discussions with clinician end users |
-- Implementation of redesigned charting system
|
-- Evaluation of the impact of redesigned charting system
|
-- Impact of redesigned charting system on care processes
|
|
9 |
Two 16-bed adult ED units in a 719-bed academic regional referral hospital (USA) |
Interface of ED telemetry system |
P, C, O |
Tools and technologies, environment, organization |
-- Assessment of baseline ED telemetry system performance in detecting life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias using on-site simulation -- Development of HFE knowledge base to define pre-intervention system state (e.g., hardware, task, process, user, organizational and environmental factors and issues) and HFE objectives
Literature review
Hardware inventory
Functions diagnostic
Real-time clinical use observation
End-user survey of needs analysis
Informal discussions with small user groups and institutional experts
|
-- Identification and grouping of design specifications for ED telemetry system in HFE categories (physical, cognitive and organizational HFE)
Modified Delphi process involving investigators and ED stakeholders
Iterative discussions with institutional biomedical engineers, device manufacturer and end users to verify feasibility, processes and value of the design specifications
-- Integration of design specifications into a multi-element intervention to improve (1) system accessibility, (2) system relevance with enhanced signal/noise ratio and system utility for real-world ED practice, and (3) organizational processes for system sustainment |
-- Incrementally implementation of the intervention over a period of 17 months
Announcement of study conduct and intervention at ED personnel meetings
Study simulation sessions
Group training and on-shift training of ED personnel
|
-- Interim and post-intervention assessment of ED telemetry system performance in detecting life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias using on-site simulation -- Review of live environment alarm log records -- Collection of unsolicited anecdotal provider reports of system utility -- Informal survey of end users to assess matching of post-intervention system functions with user needs and to collect suggestions and feedback for future improvements |
-- Impact of redesigned ED telemetry system on care processes
|
|
10 |
A 230-bed tertiary care academic hospital (USA) |
Computerized decision support system to improve adherence with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis |
C, O |
Tools and technologies |
-- Assembly of a knowledge base on DVT prophylaxis
Literature review on published clinical guidelines
Collection of protocols from academic affiliates
Discussion with subject matter experts
-- Analysis of DVT prophylaxis process
Observation with think-aloud method to understand the cognitive tasks, ordering patterns, and workflow of users
Description of clinical workflow and design requirements
|
-- Design of computerized decision support system
Creation of mock-ups of computerized decision support system
Usability testing of mock-ups with surgeons
Development of specialty-specific order menus based on feedback from surgeons
|
-- First implementation cycle
Release of the new order menus
Presentations to residents, pharmacists and nurses to describe the purpose and design of the new menus
Informational flyers posted in all surgical staff and resident working areas and break rooms
-- Second implementation cycle
Observation, semi-structured interviews, focus groups and chart reviews of the prophylaxis orders to understand sociotechnical barriers to user acceptance of the system
Reconfiguration of the order menus
Training during resident orientation
Engagement of clinical champions to support in-service trainees
|
-- Evaluation of the use of new order menus and the impact of new order menus on compliance with prophylaxis recommendations -- Evaluation of potential relationship between use of new order menus and organizational performance |
-- Impact of new order menus on care processes
Low acceptance and use of the new order menus during the first implementation cycle
Improved acceptance and use of the new order menus during the second implementation cycle
Improved compliance with prophylaxis recommendations after reconfiguring the order menus
-- Impact of new order menus on patient outcomes
|
|
11 |
A 404-bed academic hospital (Canada) |
Interface of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump |
C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Cognitive task analysis to identify information requirements of programming PCA pump
Field observation and interviews with experienced nurses to collect feedback on the current device
Bench tests to identify characteristics of the device that make its operation prone to error
Assessment of the current device based on HFE design principles
|
-- Redesign of PCA pump
|
|
-- Evaluation of redesigned interface
|
-- Impact of redesigned system on care processes
Reduced programming time
Fewer errors
|
-- Impact of redesigned system on employee outcomes
|
12 |
Not specified |
Hospital code cart medication drawer |
P, C |
Tools and technologies |
-- Analysis of current medication drawer
|
-- Redesign of medication drawer
|
|
-- Evaluation of redesigned medication drawer
User testing to compare medication retrieval time and number of wasteful actions associated with current and redesigned drawers
Questionnaire to examine user experience with redesigned medication drawer
|
-- Impact of redesigned medication drawer on care processes
Lower medication retrieval time
Fewer wasteful actions
Improved perceptions of medication drawer visibility, usability and organization
|
|