Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Audiol. 2014 Sep 1;54(2):114–123. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.948219

Table 6.

Spearman correlations between music appraisal and music perception ability. Correlations which are not significant at the 5% level are not shown. P values are shown in parentheses. Correlations which were significant after Rom (1990) corrections for possible Type 1 family-wise errors are shown in bold. The categories for appraisal have low values for the descriptor on the top and high values for the descriptor on the bottom. For example “Not Like Music” vs. “Like Music” has a scale in which the top phrase “Not Like” gets a low number and the “Like” gets a high number.

Clear
Fuzzy
Complex
Simple
Easy to follow
Hard to follow
Like very much
Dislike
Not like music
Like music
Unnatural
Natural
Unpleasant
Pleasant
Pitch 0.20 (0.05) −0.32 (0.001) 0.25 (0.01)
Timbre −0.25 (0.01) −0.21 (0.04) 0.23 (0.01) 0.35 (0.0005) 0.24 (0.02)
Melody 0.22 (0.03)