Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2014 Nov 8;50:31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.010

Table 3.

Logistic Regression of the Likelihood of Being Surgically Sterile (N = 4,567).

Variables Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
B SE Exp(B) B SE Exp(B) B SE Exp(B)
Race/Ethnicity (White)
 Black .42 .08 1.52 *** .25 .09 1.29 ** −.04 .10 .96
 Hispanic .12 .09 1.13 −.32 .10 .73 ** −.28 .11 .76 *
 Asian −.72 .27 .49 ** −.41 .28 .66 −.29 .29 .75
 Native American .89 .21 2.43 *** .69 .22 1.99 ** .54 .25 1.72 *
Socioeconomic status
 Years of education −.16 .01 .85 *** −.09 .02 .91 ***
 Household income −.05 .01 .95 ** −.05 .02 .95 **
Life course
 Age .09 .01 1.10 ***
 Union status
  Ever married −.19 .10 .83
 Employment status (Not employed)
  In school −.31 .19 .73
  Part-time −.51 .12 .60 ***
  Full-time −.21 .09 .81 *
Fertility History
 Pregnant younger than 18 .32 .09 1.37 **
 Ever unplanned pregnancy .28 .08 1.32 **
 Parity (No children)
  1 child .14 .15 1.15
  2 children 1.07 .13 2.91 ***
  3+ children 1.24 .14 3.46 ***
 Partner vasectomy −1.23 .14 .29 ***
Values
 Religiosity .00 .01 1.00
 Catholic −.38 .09 .68 ***
 Importance of motherhood .01 .02 1.01
 Importance of successful career .10 .05 1.10 *
 Importance of leisure −.04 .05 .96
Constant −1.06 .04 *** 1.71 .21 −3.14 .45 ***

Pseudo R2 .01 .05 .16
BIC 5562.9 5359.1 4884.9

Note: Reference categories in parentheses.

***

p<.001;

**

p>.01;

*

p<.05.