Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 25;2(4):286–293.

Table 1.

Randomized phase III trials with outcome data in patients receiving moderate hypofractionation radiotherapy directed at an intact prostate

Study Center Patients Median Follow-up (years) Technique Regimen Outcome Late Toxicity
Australia [11] 217 7.5 2D/3DCRT 55 Gy/20 fx vs. 64 Gy/32 fx Phoenix definition 7.5 yr FFBF 53% vs. 34% (p < .05) GU symptoms favor HFX at 4 yrs HR
ASTRO definition 44% vs. 44% 1.58 (p < .05)
No difference in late GI
Fox Chase Cancer Center [14] 303 5.7 IMRT 70.2 Gy/26 fx vs. 76 Gy/38 fx 5 yr BCF 23% vs. 21% (NS) Gr ≥ 3 GI 2% vs. 2%
Gr ≥ 3 GU 4% vs. 3%
MD Anderson [16,17] 204 4.6 efficacy 6.0 toxicity IMRT 72 Gy/30 fx vs. 75.6 Gy/42 fx ASTRO definition 5 yr FFBF 96% vs. 92% Gr ≥ 3 GI 2% vs. 1%
Gr ≥ 3 GU 1% vs. 0%
Ontario [13] 936 5.7 3DCRT 52.5 Gy/20 fx vs. 66 Gy/33 fx 5 yr BCF 60% vs 53% Gr ≥ 3 GI/GU toxicity equal (3.2%)
Italy [15,19] 168 5.8 3DCRT 62 Gy/20 fx vs. 80 Gy/40 fx Phoenix definition 5 yr FFBF 85% vs. 79% (p = .065) Gr ≥ 3 GI 1% vs. 0%
Gr ≥ 3 GU 1% vs. 2%

FFBF = freedom from biochemical failure, BCF = Biochemical or clinical failure, HFX = hypofractionated.