Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD007214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007214.pub2
Methods RCT.
Participants 70 women in established labour admitted to a hospital in Norway for delivery
Inclusion criteria: cervical dilation 4 cm or more, expected to have normal birth, at term after a normal pregnancy
Interventions Intervention group: TENS to lower back.
Comparison group: placebo TENS of identical appearance.
Conventional drugs available to both groups.
Outcomes Women’s views of pain relief and use of other analgesics.
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Coin tossed after recruitment to decide group allocation.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Participants
Unclear risk Placebo device, but not clear whether it was convincing to women and staff
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Clinical staff
Unclear risk Unclear.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Outcome assessor
Unclear risk Unclear.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low risk No apparent loss to follow up.
Other bias Unclear risk Some baseline imbalance between groups with more primiparous women in the intervention group