Table 2.
Variables | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.Number of hoped-for possible selves | - | ||||||
2.Number of feared possible selves | .31** | - | |||||
3.Number of expected possible selves | .26** | .37** | - | ||||
4.Number of balanced possible selves pairs | .26** | .26** | .03 | - | |||
5.Feared drinker possible selfa | .15 | .47** | .15 | .07 | - | ||
6.Most important hoped-for self related to academicsa | −.02 | .00 | −.11 | .25** | .03 | - | |
7.Most important feared self related to academicsa | −.19* | −.09 | −.10 | .11 | −.08 | .10 | - |
8.Most important expected self related to academicsa | .01 | .11 | .02 | .02 | .09 | .18* | .09 |
Note. Spearman’s Rho coefficient was used for two ordinal variables, phi coefficient was used for two dichotomous variables, and point-biserial coefficient was used for one dichotomous variable with one continuous variable.
1=Yes, 0=No
p<.05
p<.01