Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Choice. 2014 Mar 10;8(1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/15582159.2014.875406

Table 3.

Estimates of the Catholic School Effect on 12th-Grade Mathematics Achievement

Models Catholic
school effect
SE t-stat N
1: Main effect (without covariates) 4.720 0.890 5.304 5,430
2: Full model: (1)+ (10th-grade score,
demographics, background, spatial)
1.222 0.515 2.372 5,430
3: Strata fixed effect 1.113 0.528 2.109 5,430
4: Stratum 1: 1st quintile (lowest) 1.312 0.632 2.074 2,460
5: Stratum 2: 2nd quintile 1.335 0.708 1.886 1,330
6: Stratum 3: 3rd quintile 0.564 0.796 0.709 750
7: Stratum 4: 4th quintile 1.940 0.943 2.057 540
8: Stratum 5: 5th quintile (highest) −0.017 0.958 −0.017 350
9: 1st – 2ndquintiles, combined 1.282 0.547 2.344 3,790
10:3rd– 5th quintiles, combined 1.181 0.675 1.75 1,640

Note: Statistics are based on the averages of five imputed data. The matched sample includes about 5,430 students. About 1,660 are Catholic school students and 3,770 are public school students. According to the rules and regulations for the use of NCES restricted datasets, the numbers of observations reported throughout the document are rounded by 10 digits.

Design effect is controlled by taking into account school clusters and the probability weight of the first follow-up data.