Table 2.
Mock | SLC4A11-C | R109H | DIDS Mock | DIDS SLC4A11-C | DIDS R109H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect of DIDS on H+(OH−) Flux: pH 7.4 → pH 6.2 | ||||||
Initial pHi | 7.02 ± 0.05 | 7.05 ± 0.043 | 7.05 ± 0.03 | 7.05 ± 0.03 | 7.21 ± 0.06 | 7.04 ± 0.03 |
Minimum pHi | 6.88 ± 0.031 | 6.67 ± 0.043,4 | 6.90 ± 0.017 | 7.00 ± 0.03 | 6.51 ± 0.04 | 6.69 ± 0.03 |
ΔpHi | 0.15 ± 0.031 | 0.38 ± 0.034,5 | 0.15 ± 0.038 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
Initial Hin+, nM | 95.9 ± 10.0 | 91.1 ± 7.173 | 89.2 ± 5.66 | 89.3 ± 6.44 | 64.1 ± 8.93 | 93.3 ± 5.73 |
Minimum Hin+, nM | 133.4 ± 9.001 | 218.5 ± 17.94,6 | 125.4 ± 4.088 | 101.8 ± 6.96 | 310.6 ± 26.6 | 209 ± 12.9 |
ΔHin+, nM | 37.6 ± 5.042 | 127.4 ± 13.64,5 | 36.2 ± 6.588 | 12.5 ± 5.07 | 246.6 ± 18.4 | 116 ± 12.6 |
H+(OH−) flux, μM/s | 23.4 ± 5.96 | 62.4 ± 4.914,5 | 31.1 ± 3.159 | 23.8 ± 2.03 | 154.6 ± 7.47 | 43.4 ± 2.14 |
n | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
Effect of DIDS on H+(OH−) Flux: pH 6.2 → pH 7.4 | ||||||
Final pHi | 6.93 ± 0.042 | 6.99 ± 0.0310 | 6.99 ± 0.03 | 7.08 ± 0.02 | 7.13 ± 0.03 | 6.95 ± 0.02 |
ΔpHi | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.024,5 | 0.09 ± 0.017 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 |
Final Hin+, nM | 118.3 ± 9.912 | 103.3 ± 6.1810 | 102.8 ± 5.85 | 83.6 ± 4.85 | 74.3 ± 5.23 | 112.9 ± 5.77 |
ΔHin+, nM | 15.1 ± 0.92 | 115.2 ± 12.34,5 | 22.5 ± 2.338 | 18.3 ± 3.15 | 236.4 ± 22.1 | 96.1 ± 11.0 |
H+(OH−) flux, μM/s | 15.9 ± 0.67 | 36.2 ± 1.524,5 | 18.3 ± 2.687 | 14.0 ± 0.88 | 107.4 ± 4.61 | 34.1 ± 1.48 |
n | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
n, No. of experiments. DIDS, 4,4′-diisothiocyano-2,2′-stilbenedisulfonate. Note: the absolute values of the delta (Δ) and flux measurements are depicted. 1P < 0.05 vs. mock + DIDS. 2P < 0.02 vs. mock + DIDS. 3P < 0.05 vs. SLC4A11-C + DIDS. 4P < 0.01, SLC4A11-C vs. mock or R109H. 5P < 0.001 vs. SLC4A11-C + DIDS. 6P < 0.02 vs. SLC4A11-C + DIDS. 7P < 0.001 vs. R109H + DIDS. 8P < 0.005 vs. R109H + DIDS. 9P < 0.01 vs. R109H + DIDS. 10P < 0.01 vs. SLC4A11-C + DIDS.