Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-14-2

Table 3.

Associations a between pregnancy levels of PFOS/PFOA (ng/ml) and offspring DCDQ-score b

Exposure Combined d (N = 1,106) Greenland (n = 526) Ukraine (n = 491) Poland (n = 89)
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
PFOS Low ref ref ref ref
Medium −0.4 (−1.9, 1.2) −1.2 (−3.0, 0.7) 1.4 (−0.2, 3.1) −0.3 (−6.0, 5.3)
High −1.7 (−3.8, 0.5) −0.7 (−2.6, 1.2) 0.6 (−1.1, 2.2) −2.1 (−7.8, 3.5)
Continuousc −0.1 (−1.2, 1.1) −0.2 (−1.9, 1.4) 0.5 (−1.0, 2.0) −2.4 (−9.1, 4.3)
PFOA Low ref ref ref ref
Medium −0.6 (−1.9, 0.7) −1.2 (−3.0, 0.7) −0.2 (−1.8, 1.4) 1.5 (−4.1, 7.1)
High −0.4 (−1.9, 1.1) −0.1 (−2.0, 1.7) −1.2 (−2.8, 0.5) −3.7 (−9.3, 1.9)
Continuousc −0.2 (−1.2, 0.9) 0.8 (−0.8, 2.5) −0.6 (−1.9, 0.8) −2.7 (−8.3, 2.8)

CI, confidence interval; DCDQ, developmental coordination disorder questionnaire; PFOA, perfluorooctanoate; PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonate; Ref, referece group.

aAdjusted for: maternal cotinine level during pregnancy, maternal alcohol consumption at conception, maternal age at pregnancy, gestational age at blood-sampling and child sex. bDCDQ score range from 15 to 75 (low scores indicate motor problems). cβ = the change in score according to one natural-log unit increase in PFOA and PFOS. dadditionally adjusted for country.