Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 6;144(2):263–270. doi: 10.1111/imm.12369

Table 1.

Results from a general linear model constructed to analyse the variation in the magnitude of the IFN-γ response at the disclosing test (recorded as both PPD-B minus negative control and PPD-B minus PPD-A), in relation to the following explanatory variables: outcome infection status, age, sex and source population, for 56 badgers captured in Gloucestershire between 2006 and 2012

Response variable Explanatory variables Level Estimate1 (SE) t(50)2 P value
PPD-B minus negative control Outcome infection status (reference level IFN-γ positive only) Stat-Pak positive 0·53 (0·19) 2·77 0·008
Culture positive 0·96 (0·29) 3·37 0·001
Age (reference level adult) Cub −0·64 (0·19) −3·30 0·002
Sex (reference level female) Male −0·42 (0·16) −2·61 0·012
Source population (reference level BVS) WP 0·13 (0·22) 0·58 0·566
PPD-B minus PPD-A (B–A) Outcome infection status (reference level IFN-γ positive only) Stat-Pak positive 0·54 (0·19) 2·86 0·007
Culture positive 1·01 (0·28) 3·55 < 0·001
Age (reference level adult) Cub −0·59 (0·19) −3·03 0·004
Sex (reference level female) Male −0·38 (0·16) −2·40 0·020
Source population (reference level BVS) WP 0·23 (0·22) 1·06 0·297
1

Estimate from the model of the difference in the mean value relative to the reference level, with its associated standard error (SE).

2

The test statistic from the model output with associated degrees of freedom in brackets.

Note: Significant effects are shown in bold, P < 0·05.

Abbreviations: BVS, Badger Vaccine Study; IFN-γ interferon-γ; PPD-A, purified protein derivative from Mycobacterium avium; PPD-B, purified protein derivative from Mycobacterium bovis.